2015
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2014.2387552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Complexity Compression for Sensory Systems

Abstract: This paper presents a low-complexity mixed-domain data compression solution suitable for resource-constrained wireless sensory systems. Data compression reduces the transmission bandwidth of sensor nodes helping them to save energy and extend their operation time. In the proposed compression solution, the sensor signal is decorrelated in the analog domain and converted to digital using a compressing analogto-digital converter. The compressing converter is based on a cyclic converter architecture and is able to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huffman codes [2] and arithmetic codes [3] are the most widely used statistical codes for data compression. The main disadvantage of statistical codes is that two passes are required over the data to produce codes/codewords and this two‐pass approach is not efficient for low computational devices such as sensory systems [4] and storage devices [5], where the data needs to be read, compressed and written within one pass over input data. In contrast to statistical codes/coding methods, universal codes/coding methods do not require probability values of input symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huffman codes [2] and arithmetic codes [3] are the most widely used statistical codes for data compression. The main disadvantage of statistical codes is that two passes are required over the data to produce codes/codewords and this two‐pass approach is not efficient for low computational devices such as sensory systems [4] and storage devices [5], where the data needs to be read, compressed and written within one pass over input data. In contrast to statistical codes/coding methods, universal codes/coding methods do not require probability values of input symbols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%