2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low carrying capacity a risk for threatened Chinook Salmon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the two-stage models described above, we also fit single-stage models for the entire life cycle (Hinrichsen & Paulsen, 2020). We then compared the single-stage adult carrying capacity estimates and their confidence interval widths to those derived from a two-stage model.…”
Section: Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the two-stage models described above, we also fit single-stage models for the entire life cycle (Hinrichsen & Paulsen, 2020). We then compared the single-stage adult carrying capacity estimates and their confidence interval widths to those derived from a two-stage model.…”
Section: Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these SR models, recruits are adult progeny, intrinsic productivity is the recruits per spawner at low spawner numbers and carrying capacity is the number of spawners at which recruitment equals spawners (Hilborn & Walters, 1992). Extinction risk of a population is known to be closely linked to its intrinsic productivity and carrying capacity; as intrinsic productivity or carrying capacity increases, extinction risk declines (Hakoyama et al, 2000;Hilderbrand, 2003;Hinrichsen & Paulsen, 2020). Intrinsic productivity controls how quickly a population rebounds from low abundance, while carrying capacity controls how often the lows occur (Hakoyama et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Problematically, there is substantial uncertainty regarding the degree of change that can be exerted across and within these categories, and what combination of changes will most cost‐effectively and sustainably reduce mortality. Freshwater habitat capacity deficits have recently been identified as a major factor directly impacting population abundance which has been largely overlooked in Columbia River Basin salmonids (Bond et al 2019, Hinrichsen and Paulsen 2020, NOAA Fisheries 2020). Specifically, restoring salmonid carrying capacity through tributary rehabilitation actions has been identified as a key component of recovery efforts for salmon and steelhead ( O. mykiss ) in the Pacific Northwest, USA (NOAA Fisheries 2016 a , b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have included increasing and improving existing habitat for both spawning adults and rearing juveniles. However, estimating habitat carrying capacity (both historic and contemporary) for various life stages of Pacific salmon, as well as identifying important habitat characteristics that influence capacity, has been an ongoing but necessary challenge (Bond et al 2019, Hinrichsen and Paulsen 2020, NOAA Fisheries 2020). Reliable methods to better understand fish–habitat relationships and estimate capacity are necessary to identify those salmon and steelhead life stages that are limited by habitat capacity to better direct tributary rehabilitation efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%