Low-Carbon Quick Wins: Integrating Short-Term Sustainable Transport Options in Climate Policy in Low-Income Countries

Abstract

In low income countries (LICs) in Africa and Asia per capita transport greenhouse gas emissions are relatively low but are expected to grow. Therefore, a substantial reduction in projected increases is required to bring emissions in line with long-term global climate objectives. Literature on how LICs are integrating climate change mitigation and sustainable transport strategies is limited. Key drivers of transport policy include improving accessibility, congestion, air quality, energy security, with reducing greenhouse gas emissions being of lower priority. This paper assesses the current status, feasibility and potential of selected low-carbon transport measures with high sustainable development benefits that can be implemented in the short to medium term, so- called ‘quick wins’. It examines to what extent ten such quick wins are integrated in climate change strategies in nine low- and middle-income countries in Africa and South Asia. The research method comprises expert interviews, an online questionnaire survey of experts and policymakers in the focus countries, and a review of literature and government plans. Results indicate that sustainable urban transport policies and measures are considered high priority, with vehicle-related measures such as fuel quality and fuel economy standards and electric two- and three-wheelers being of key relevance. In existing national climate change strategies, these quick wins are integrated to a certain extent; however, with better coordination between transport and energy and environment agencies such strategies can be improved. A general conclusion of this paper is that for LICs, quick wins can connect a ‘top-down’ climate perspective with a ‘bottom-up’ transport sector perspective. A knowledge gap exists as to the mitigation potential and sustainable development benefits of these quick wins in the local context of LICs.

Development of Methodology and Assessment of Ecological Safety of the EAEU and CIS Regions in the Context of Sustainable Development

“…The greatest efficiency of this tool in achieving sustainable development goals was achieved at a high level of socioeconomic development of the city (Huang et al 2021). For sustainable urban transport, fuel quality and fuel economy standards, as well as electric two-and three-wheeled vehicles, are prioritized (Bakker et al 2019).…”

A Review of Transport Policies in Support of Climate Actions in Asian Cities and Countries

“…Some reports and studies argue that the electrification of the transport sector holds potential opportunity for climate change [22][23][24][25] but note that transitions to electric mobility need to be coupled with the replacement of fossil fuel vehicles [26]. Others advocate the need for comprehensive urban transport planning and changes in user behavior [27][28][29].…”

East Africa’s Policy and Stakeholder Integration of Informal Operators in Electric Mobility Transitions—Kigali, Nairobi, Kisumu and Dar es Salaam

“…Pathways to reach more sustainable urban mobility are structured around the three-pronged "Avoid-Shift-Improve" paradigm that promotes trip reductions and shifts towards public transport and non-motorized modes, together with increased vehicle efficiency [3]. Electrification of mobility is commonly conceptualized as part of the "Improve" component and as a low-carbon transport strategy [4]. This transition also links with the necessity to phase out the old solutions [5] such as internal combustion engines (ICE), inevitably resulting in socio-economic consequences for those who depend on these technologies as a source of income and livelihood.…”