2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-carbon hydrogen production via electron beam plasma methane pyrolysis: Techno-economic analysis and carbon footprint assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, demonstrating that this process is energy unsustainable in an environmental context Desantes et al, 2020 This study compared the use of fuel cells, hydrogen and conventional engines for mid-size passenger vehicles in Europe. The study concluded that the global warming potential for these three engines over the lifetime of the vehicle were: Electric vehicle = 15,000 kg CO 2 eq Hydrogen = 9000 to 49,000 kg CO 2 eq Conventional diesel-based = 24,500 kg CO 2 eq Kerscher et al, 2021 The life cycle emissions of pyrolysis technologies are in the range of 1.9 to 6.4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 , compared to state-of-the-art technology based on steam methane reforming technology 10.8 4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 Kim et al, 2021 Molten carbonate fuel cell system analysed for environmental impacts in this study showed global warming potential as 0.3 kg CO 2 eq/kWh, abiotic depletion potential as 1.90 g Sb eq/kWh, acidification potential as 30.5 g SO 2 eq/kWh and eutrophication potential as 0.01 g PO 4 3− eq/kWh. The main cause for the impact was found to be the reforming of liquefied natural gas in the operation stage Li et al, 2021 This study calculated the environmental impacts of hydrogen production through coal gasification, natural gas steam reforming, thermochemical, water electrolysis via wind-power and thermochemical water splitting via Cu-Cl cycle in China.…”
Section: Key Findings and Recommendations For Future Life Cycle Assessment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, demonstrating that this process is energy unsustainable in an environmental context Desantes et al, 2020 This study compared the use of fuel cells, hydrogen and conventional engines for mid-size passenger vehicles in Europe. The study concluded that the global warming potential for these three engines over the lifetime of the vehicle were: Electric vehicle = 15,000 kg CO 2 eq Hydrogen = 9000 to 49,000 kg CO 2 eq Conventional diesel-based = 24,500 kg CO 2 eq Kerscher et al, 2021 The life cycle emissions of pyrolysis technologies are in the range of 1.9 to 6.4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 , compared to state-of-the-art technology based on steam methane reforming technology 10.8 4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 Kim et al, 2021 Molten carbonate fuel cell system analysed for environmental impacts in this study showed global warming potential as 0.3 kg CO 2 eq/kWh, abiotic depletion potential as 1.90 g Sb eq/kWh, acidification potential as 30.5 g SO 2 eq/kWh and eutrophication potential as 0.01 g PO 4 3− eq/kWh. The main cause for the impact was found to be the reforming of liquefied natural gas in the operation stage Li et al, 2021 This study calculated the environmental impacts of hydrogen production through coal gasification, natural gas steam reforming, thermochemical, water electrolysis via wind-power and thermochemical water splitting via Cu-Cl cycle in China.…”
Section: Key Findings and Recommendations For Future Life Cycle Assessment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steam reforming is therefore represented twice in Figure 1. The carbon dioxide emissions resulting from steam reforming plants could be reduced by integrating carbon capture technologies, which are not yet state-of-the-art (TRLs 7-8) [13,14].…”
Section: Hydrogen-technology Options For Its Production and The Resul...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, our model in Section 4 can theoretically include a possible CO 2 footprint. In Germany, there are already a couple of companies promoting pyrolysis with a technology readiness level (TRL) of 6-8 based on different kinds of plasma arcs [21] like the German company Graforce [22], the British company HiiROC, or the Canada-based company Pyrogenesis. Here, using renewable energy, natural gas is decomposed into H 2 and carbon black without any or only insignificant CO 2 production on lifecycle basis.…”
Section: Different Colors Of Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most authors do, we focus solely on the generation costs, not on the costs for setting up the infrastructure. Different authors expect that between 2030-2040 we will reach the break-even point between all technologies [6,21]. This is a straightforward assumption, since hydrogen itself is a homogenous good and consequently we face a Energies 2021, 14, 5720 5 of 19 Bertrand competition.…”
Section: Cost Structure Of Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%