“…Therefore, demonstrating that this process is energy unsustainable in an environmental context Desantes et al, 2020 This study compared the use of fuel cells, hydrogen and conventional engines for mid-size passenger vehicles in Europe. The study concluded that the global warming potential for these three engines over the lifetime of the vehicle were: Electric vehicle = 15,000 kg CO 2 eq Hydrogen = 9000 to 49,000 kg CO 2 eq Conventional diesel-based = 24,500 kg CO 2 eq Kerscher et al, 2021 The life cycle emissions of pyrolysis technologies are in the range of 1.9 to 6.4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 , compared to state-of-the-art technology based on steam methane reforming technology 10.8 4 kg CO 2 eq/kg H 2 Kim et al, 2021 Molten carbonate fuel cell system analysed for environmental impacts in this study showed global warming potential as 0.3 kg CO 2 eq/kWh, abiotic depletion potential as 1.90 g Sb eq/kWh, acidification potential as 30.5 g SO 2 eq/kWh and eutrophication potential as 0.01 g PO 4 3− eq/kWh. The main cause for the impact was found to be the reforming of liquefied natural gas in the operation stage Li et al, 2021 This study calculated the environmental impacts of hydrogen production through coal gasification, natural gas steam reforming, thermochemical, water electrolysis via wind-power and thermochemical water splitting via Cu-Cl cycle in China.…”