1992
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loudness bisection and masking in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Abstract: The bisection method of animal psychophysical scaling was examined as a measurement procedure. The critical assumptions of bisection scaling, as described by Pfanzagl (1968), were tested to determine if a valid equal-interval scale could be derived. A valid scale was derived in which loudness for the rat (Rattus norvegicus; n = 13) was a power function of sound pressure for 4-kHz tones. Masking noise reduced the discriminability of tonal stimuli but did not affect the bisection point. This result is consistent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings demonstrate that rats can discriminate between lights flashing at two different rates. The generalization test sessions using intermediate flash rates revealed that flash rate produced similar sigmoidal psychophysical functions as other types of stimuli (e.g., light duration and sound intensity; Church & Deluty, ; Raslear, Shurtleff, & Simmons, ). The bisection points of our rats (mean = 2.47 Hz) were nearer the geometric mean of the training stimuli (2.24 Hz; marked on Figure with a dashed vertical line) than the arithmetic mean of 3 Hz, which supports the use of the geometric over arithmetic mean in predicting the bisection point of temporally‐based stimuli (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These findings demonstrate that rats can discriminate between lights flashing at two different rates. The generalization test sessions using intermediate flash rates revealed that flash rate produced similar sigmoidal psychophysical functions as other types of stimuli (e.g., light duration and sound intensity; Church & Deluty, ; Raslear, Shurtleff, & Simmons, ). The bisection points of our rats (mean = 2.47 Hz) were nearer the geometric mean of the training stimuli (2.24 Hz; marked on Figure with a dashed vertical line) than the arithmetic mean of 3 Hz, which supports the use of the geometric over arithmetic mean in predicting the bisection point of temporally‐based stimuli (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The empirical verification of all equalities in Equation 12 is believed to support the possibility that M C M A M B M C (w .5), making actual measurement possible (Adams & Fagot, 1975;Coombs, Dawes, & Tversky, 1970;Cross, 1964;Fagot & Stewart, 1970;Irtel, 2005;Pfanzagl, 1971;Raslear, Shurtleff, & Simmons, 1992). …”
Section: Bisymmetry Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%