2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0580-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of traditional knowledge aggravates wolf–human conflict in Georgia (Caucasus) in the wake of socio-economic change

Abstract: Reports of the damage from wolf attacks have increased considerably over the last decade in Georgia (in the Caucasus). We interviewed locals about this problem in two focal regions: the Lanchkhuti area (in western Georgia) and Kazbegi District (in eastern Georgia) where livestock numbers had increased by an order of magnitude owing to dramatic shifts in the local economies over the last decade. This coincided with expanding habitats for wolves (abandoned plantations, for example). We found that the perceived d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with patterns observed in the rest of Europe, where carnivores decreased, only to increase again [7]. For example in Georgia (Caucasus), the damage from wolf attacks increased considerably after a 50 year break since traditional knowledge about how to protect the livestock was lost [40]. In Slovakia, the use of livestock-guarding dogs decreased when the wolves decreased, however when the wolves increased again the herds that had kept their guard dogs experienced 70 per cent less damage [73].…”
Section: Local and Traditional Knowledge Of Protecting Livestock Fromsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with patterns observed in the rest of Europe, where carnivores decreased, only to increase again [7]. For example in Georgia (Caucasus), the damage from wolf attacks increased considerably after a 50 year break since traditional knowledge about how to protect the livestock was lost [40]. In Slovakia, the use of livestock-guarding dogs decreased when the wolves decreased, however when the wolves increased again the herds that had kept their guard dogs experienced 70 per cent less damage [73].…”
Section: Local and Traditional Knowledge Of Protecting Livestock Fromsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The herding practices indicate the use of practical experience-based knowledge, not only about handling livestock and knowing the grazing grounds, but also about the behavior of carnivores and how to protect the livestock [5,7,[40][41][42]. Ethnological initiatives from the early twentieth century have contributed to the written documentation of such knowledge in Sweden [9,43].…”
Section: Carnivores Livestock Local and Traditional Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Røskaft et al [54] argued that insufficient knowledge regarding wolf ecology end ethology can influence attitudes negatively. Along with the previously mentioned learning topics, learning about proper human behavior [55] and practices regarding wolf damage prevention [56] should be considered.…”
Section: Attitudes and Knowledge Before Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors argue that even shorter environmental courses can promote positive attitudes and higher knowledge (Campbell Bradley et al, 1999;Prokop, Tuncer, & Kvasničák, 2007). Kikvidze and Tevzadze (2015) stressed the importance of traditional knowledge, such as appropriate husbandry practices among livestock breeders to reduce wolves' predation. Besides the perceived damage, fear also plays an important role in attitude formation.…”
Section: Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%