Loss and Damage in the mountain cryosphere

Abstract

The mountain cryosphere, which includes glaciers, permafrost and snow, is one of the Earth's systems most strongly affected by climate change. In recent decades, changes in the cryosphere have been well documented in many high-mountain regions. Whilst there are some benefits from snow and ice loss, the negative impacts, including from glacier lake outburst floods, and variations in glacier runoff, are generally considered to far outweigh the positive impacts, particularly if cultural impacts are considered. In international climate policy, there has been growing momentum to address the negative impacts of climate change, or 'loss and damage' (L&D) from climate change. It is not clear exactly what can and should be done to tackle L&D, but researchers and practitioners are beginning to engage with policy discussions and develop potential frameworks and supporting information. Despite the strong impact of climate change on the mountain cryosphere, there has been limited interaction between cryosphere researchers and L&D. Therefore, little work has been done to consider how L&D in the mountain cryosphere might be conceptualized, categorized and assessed. Here we make a first attempt to analyze L&D in the mountain cryosphere by conducting a systematic literature review to extract L&D impacts and examples from existing literature. We find that L&D is a global phenomenon in the mountain cryosphere and has been more frequently documented in the developing world, both in relation with slow and sudden onset processes. We develop a categorization of L&D, making distinctions between physical and societal impacts, primary and secondary impacts,

Reservoir Governance in World's Water Towers Needs to Anticipate Multi‐purpose Use

“…The expected changes in runoff seasonality and variability can have socioeconomic impacts including a seasonal reduction in water availability for irrigation (Biemans et al., 2019), municipal and industrial needs (Flörke et al., 2018; Pritchard, 2019), environmental flow requirements (Best, 2019; Körner et al., 2017), or hydropower production (Beniston et al., 2018). These impacts can lead to losses of income and livelihoods (Huggel et al., 2019), increased anthropogenic stress on rivers (Best, 2019), social instability or conflicts, and sudden migrations triggered by water shortages (Pritchard, 2019).…”

Loss and damage from climate change and implicit assumptions of sustainable development

“…Here, there is also some initial recognition of L&D to natural capital as non-substitutable, which is discussed as "irreversible" damage to natural resources that cannot be replaced, repaired, or restored, e.g., freshwater resource loss from melting cryosphere (Stabinsky and Hoffmaister 2015;Huggel et al 2019), which differentiates this perspective from the substitutability assumptions in cluster 1. Cluster 2 is the first place where ecological science would have an explicit role in measuring and addressing L&D. However, while distinct from cluster 1 in its rejection of substitutability assumptions and focus on critical natural capital, the primary focus is still on the stock of capital as the determinant of economic growth, thus remaining within capital theory more broadly.…”

Closing the Adaptation Gap in Mountains

“…Importantly, however, progress on these constituent dimensions must be made in concert; it is not sufficient, for example, to close the realization gap if a coherence gap persists. Furthermore, despite being malleable in principle, both soft and hard limits to adaptation can impede progress toward closing gaps, with hard limits suggesting the possibility of inevitable losses and damages in mountain areas (Huggel et al 2019).…”

“…. This is leading to profound changes in glacial environments, alpine hydrology, and mountains ecosystems, changes that are already being reflected in agriculture, water resources, energy production, tourism, increased natural hazards, and effects on intangible relationships with mountain places(Carey et al 2017;Huss et al 2017;Huggel et al 2019). Climatic exposures in mountain regions are already among the most significant observed globally, and…”