2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking good. BMI, attractiveness bias and visual attention

Abstract: The aim of this study was to study attentional bias when viewing one's own and a control body, and to relate this bias to body-weight and attractiveness ratings. Participants were 51 normal-weight female students with an unrestrained eating style. They were successively shown pictures of their own and a control body for 30s each, while their eye movements (overt attention) were being measured. Afterwards, participants were asked to identify the most attractive and most unattractive body part of both their own … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
66
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
66
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, this identifies vigilance towards thin-ideal bodies as more maladaptive and a greater risk factor for developing an eating disorder, as opposed to the avoidance of non-thin bodies. These findings corroborate previous empirical research showing an association between bias to thin-ideal body shapes and eating disorder pathology [7,9,14]. The selective attentional pattern may represent maladaptive social comparison strategies [54] in the sense that young women with elevated eating disorder pathology engage in upward social comparison by comparing their body to those perceived as more attractive (i.e., attentional bias to thin bodies) and avoid those perceived as less attractive (i.e., attentional avoidance of non-thin bodies).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, this identifies vigilance towards thin-ideal bodies as more maladaptive and a greater risk factor for developing an eating disorder, as opposed to the avoidance of non-thin bodies. These findings corroborate previous empirical research showing an association between bias to thin-ideal body shapes and eating disorder pathology [7,9,14]. The selective attentional pattern may represent maladaptive social comparison strategies [54] in the sense that young women with elevated eating disorder pathology engage in upward social comparison by comparing their body to those perceived as more attractive (i.e., attentional bias to thin bodies) and avoid those perceived as less attractive (i.e., attentional avoidance of non-thin bodies).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, women high on eating disorder symptoms spent more time looking at attractive compared to unattractive body parts of other women [7]. These eye-tracking results have been replicated in a sample of overweight men and women viewing images of other men and women, respectively [13] and also in young women who were both dissatisfied with their own bodies and had a higher body mass index (BMI) [14]. Moreover, women with bulimia nervosa showed significantly longer fixations, relative to controls, when presented with images of female bodies that were thinner in comparison to the self [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first one is the clothing effect. The typical stimuli used in previous research included photographic or computerised images of females in swimwear (Roefs et al, 2008;Lykins et al, 2014), underwear (Jansen et al, 2005), Lycra (Blechert et al, 2009;Jannelle et al, 2009) or nude (Glauert et al, 2010;Horndasch et al, 2012), thus revealing the shape of the figure in great detail. What is yet to be considered is the viewing behaviour for images where the body regions are somewhat ambiguous, such as in everyday clothing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eye-tracking studies the number of fixations is related to the amount of information extracted from a stimulus [54,55]. Besides the number of fixations, dwell time, the amount of time that attention spends at a location once it is deployed to that location [56], can also be used as an indicator of the amount of attention paid to a stimulus [57]. Dwell-time represents the total duration (in milliseconds) of time that was spent looking at a stimulus [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%