2017
DOI: 10.1177/1750698017701609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking forward to the past: An interdisciplinary discussion on the use of historical analogies and their effects

Abstract: "This is Munich all over again!": Such comparisons between a present situation and a past one (i.e. a historical analogy) are common in public and political discourses. Historical analogies were used for centuries but have received increased interest in the last 50 years from scholars in political science, history, and psychology. Despite existing interdisciplinary exchanges, it remains difficult to identify the variables involved in the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Historical analogies play four different roles for people engaged in conflict resolution: they shape and communicate the representation of the current situation, define the role of the actors in that situation, shape the decision-making process by anchoring it in previous decisions, and serve as a means of persuasion (Ghilani et al, 2017). This persuasive aspect of historical analogies has been subtly used in the Round Table agreements by the governmental side, but it never had a fundamental role in the negotiation process.…”
Section: Why Historical Closure Could Be Beneficial Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical analogies play four different roles for people engaged in conflict resolution: they shape and communicate the representation of the current situation, define the role of the actors in that situation, shape the decision-making process by anchoring it in previous decisions, and serve as a means of persuasion (Ghilani et al, 2017). This persuasive aspect of historical analogies has been subtly used in the Round Table agreements by the governmental side, but it never had a fundamental role in the negotiation process.…”
Section: Why Historical Closure Could Be Beneficial Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In commemorative practices, social identity processes can occur through the ways that leaders selectively remember events and give meaning to them, defining their group, its interests, and its norms (Liu, Wilson, Mcclure, & Higgins, ). During commemoration, leaders can mobilize their audiences by drawing selectively on shared historical representations to legitimize particular political agendas (Liu et al ., ), as through analogies, for example (Ghilani et al ., ). Historical representations constitute part of the fabric of the social reality for any group of people (Hilton & Liu, ), and memory can collectively communicate solidarity and coherence (Hammack & Pilecki, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This use of 1974 provides a historical analogy between the people who fought in 1974 and SYRIZA in the 21st century. As Aristotle knew, such analogies use the past to make sense of political uncertainty in the present (Ghilani et al ., ). By calling audiences to imagine such similarities between 1974 and SYRIZA here, historical analogies lend plausibility to suggestions to widen both democracy and political and social rights (6–7, 2008), by which means the party might fulfil its duty, or repays its debts, to the past.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, this focus can obscure the operation of collective motivation and agency via the intentionality of cultural practices. Reminders about the 9/11 attacks do not happen at random; instead, they more typically occur in the context of commemoration practices that creators have deliberately designed to afford remembering (Ghilani et al, 2017). Although many people make deliberate choices to engage in 9/11 commemoration practices, they also encounter them (and reminders about 9/11 attacks) in more inadvertent fashion without explicit intention to do so or despite explicit preferences otherwise.…”
Section: Conclusion: Implications For Conceptions Of Collectivementioning
confidence: 99%