2016
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1117732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Looking at the metabolic consequences of the colchicine-based in vivo autophagic flux assay

Abstract: Monitoring autophagic flux in vivo or in organs remains limited and the ideal methods relative to the techniques possible with cell culture may not exist. Recently, a few papers have demonstrated the feasibility of measuring autophagic flux in vivo by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of pharmacological agents (chloroquine, leupeptin, vinblastine, and colchicine). However, the metabolic consequences of the administration of these drugs remain largely unknown. Here, we report that 0.8 mg/kg/day IP colchicine incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Livers sampled 2 and 16 h after the last meal were homogenized and analysed according to the previously detailed protocol 24 and using the following antibodies: anti-phospho- ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (P- RPS6K1, Thr389, #9205, Cell Signaling Technology); anti- RPS6K1 (#9202, Cell Signaling Technology); phospho-EIF4EBP1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (P- EIF4EBP1, Thr37/Thr46, #9459, Cell Signaling Technology); anti- EIF4EBP1 (#9452, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-phospho eIF2α (Ser51, #9721, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-carboxyl terminal eIF2α (#9722, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-phospho AMP-activated protein kinase (P-AMPK, Thr172, #2532, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-AMPK (#2532, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-β-tubulin (TUBB)(#2146, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-LC3B (#2775, Cell Signaling Technology). All these antibodies have already been validated in rainbow trout 24 , 28 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livers sampled 2 and 16 h after the last meal were homogenized and analysed according to the previously detailed protocol 24 and using the following antibodies: anti-phospho- ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (P- RPS6K1, Thr389, #9205, Cell Signaling Technology); anti- RPS6K1 (#9202, Cell Signaling Technology); phospho-EIF4EBP1, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (P- EIF4EBP1, Thr37/Thr46, #9459, Cell Signaling Technology); anti- EIF4EBP1 (#9452, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-phospho eIF2α (Ser51, #9721, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-carboxyl terminal eIF2α (#9722, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-phospho AMP-activated protein kinase (P-AMPK, Thr172, #2532, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-AMPK (#2532, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-β-tubulin (TUBB)(#2146, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-LC3B (#2775, Cell Signaling Technology). All these antibodies have already been validated in rainbow trout 24 , 28 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…previously detailed (Belghit et al, 2014) using the following antibodies: anti-phospho-ribosomal protein S6 (S6 Ser235/Ser236, 4856, Cell Signaling Technologies); anti-carboxyl terminal S6 (2217, Cell Signaling Technologies); anti-phospho-eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α Ser51, 9721, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-carboxyl terminal eIF2α (9722, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-β-tubulin (2146, Cell Signaling Technology); anti-translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 23 (TIM23, 611222, BD Transduction Laboratories TM ), anti-mitofusin2 (MFN2, ab56889, Abcam); anti-parkin RBR E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (PARKIN, ab15954, Abcam); anti-phospho-ubiquitin (Ser65) (Ser65, ABS1513-I, EMD Millipore); anti-total ubiquitin (MAB1510, EMD Millipore); and anti-cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP, 95425, Cell Signaling Technology). All of these antibodies (except anti-cleaved PARP) have already been validated in rainbow trout (Belghit et al, 2014;Seiliez et al, 2016;Séité et al, 2018). For cleaved PARP, the amino sequence of the corresponding protein was monitored in the SIGENAE database (http://www.sigenae.org) to check for the conservation of the antigen sequence with the corresponding sequence from mammals, ensuring a good specificity of the mammalian antibody used in the analysis of our samples.…”
Section: Western Blot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed on whole fry sampled 16 h after the last meal during the first sampling (N=6 per diet) and on the liver of fish sampled 16 h after the feeding trial (second sampling, N=6 per condition) The protocol conditions for sample preparation and RT-qPCR were as previously described (Fontagné-Dicharry et al, 2015;Seiliez et al, 2016). The primers used for qPCR assays were also as described in previous studies (Seiliez et al, 2016;Séité et al, 2018;Séité et al, 2019). For the expression analysis, relative quantification of target gene expression was done using the ΔCT method (Pfaffl et al, 2002).…”
Section: Reverse Transcription-quantitative Pcr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oil Red O (Sigma, O1391) staining was done by described previously methods with optimal cutting temperature of frozen samples and consequent staining. 40…”
Section: Histological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%