2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16640-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal study of visual field changes determined by Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 in patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa

Abstract: The aim of this study is to determine the progress of the visual field defects obtained by the Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 program (HFA 10-2) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The medical records of 45 eyes of 45 RP patients who had at least 3 visual field tests were reviewed. Linear mixed models were used to follow the changes of the mean deviation and the average sensitivity of 4, 12, and 20 points in three concentric squares, designated as S4, S12, and S20. The median follow-up time was 3.86 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The second explanation is the great heterogeneity of macular involvement among RP patients illustrated by the large number of causative genes, which cause various underlying biochemical pathways. [16][17][18] In certain RP subtypes, macular degeneration occurs relatively early in the disease course. 19 In this type, the EZ in the macular area might disappear evenly, which is different from a shorting of the EZ, and the curvature might be unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second explanation is the great heterogeneity of macular involvement among RP patients illustrated by the large number of causative genes, which cause various underlying biochemical pathways. [16][17][18] In certain RP subtypes, macular degeneration occurs relatively early in the disease course. 19 In this type, the EZ in the macular area might disappear evenly, which is different from a shorting of the EZ, and the curvature might be unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldmann perimetry test results showed similar progression of her peripheral visual field loss, and the MD slope was similar. Given that the values obtained for the right eye at the first examination may be an outlier, the progression of sensitivity loss of would be almost identical in both eyes and comparable with the reported average of − 0.46 dB/year [ 8 ]. Overall, long-term anti-VEGF therapy did not induce rapid progression of central or peripheral visual field loss in this patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, It may be unsuitable to average the sensitivities (dB) of each point because the dB is logarithmic scale. When calculating MS and FS, Sayo converted dB to 1/Lambert, and then average the values, not simply to average the sensitivities (dB) 32 . In future study, this method seem to be standard for measurement of retinal sensitivities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future study, this method seem to be standard for measurement of retinal sensitivities. Moreover, further studies are needed to compare the both macular sensitivities calculated by threshold sensitivities or based upon TD plot values, as Sayo described 32 . Second, RP is caused by mutations in more than 50 responsible genes 33 , and RP patient series therefore present a genetically heterogeneous group of retinal degenerative diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%