Longitudinal Study of Type I Interlay Tympanoplasty

Chandra, M.; Jassal, Satveer Singh

doi:10.1007/s12070-017-1185-3

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results are comparable with study of Jain et al, [19] they found a successful take-up rate of 96.6% for temporalis fascia, while Chandra and Jassal, [20] , they found a successful take-up rate of 96% for temporalis fascia, other study done by Patil et al, [21] , the success rate was 96% with temporalis fascia, while in the study done by Kumar et al, [22] , the success rate with temporalis fascia was 93.3%. There is no related studies using perichondrial graft with interlay technique.…”

Section: Zagazig University Medical Journalsupporting

confidence: 91%

Interlay Technique Tympanoplasty: Surgical Difficulties with Variable Grafts

El-Feky¹,

Abdelmaksod²,

Mohamed³

et al. 2019

Zagazig University Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Perforation of the tympanic membrane is most commonly the result of chronic ear disease. However, it can also result from various forms of trauma, which includes iatrogenic and direct physical injuries, burns, scalds and pressure effects. Most of these perforations heal spontaneously, whereas the remaining long-standing perforations that lead to recurrent ear discharge need tympanoplasty. Objectives: the aim of this study was to evaluate the results of interlay technique of tympanoplasty with respect to graft uptake and hearing status and to compare surgical difficulties between variable grafts. Patients and Methods: A total of 20 Patients included in the study were 6 males and 14 females, their age ranged from 10 years to 50 years presented with dry large central tympanic membrane perforations being inactive for at least one month without treatment were operated by interlay myringoplasty . Results: In our study, we recorded the success rate to be 90% in interlay myringoplasty and this is in accordance with the success rate reported by other studies using interlay technique. Conclusions: Interlay tympanoplasty results in excellent graft uptake and good post operative air bone gap (ABG) closure. A main advantage of this technique includes prevention of anterior blunting, lateralization and medialization of graft. Interlay tympanoplasty abolishes chances of epithelial cyst formation as in overlay technique and myringitis due to endothelium overgrowth as in underlay technique

show abstract

Section: Zagazig University Medical Journalsupporting

confidence: 91%

Interlay Technique Tympanoplasty: Surgical Difficulties with Variable Grafts

El-Feky¹,

Abdelmaksod²,

Mohamed³

et al. 2019

Zagazig University Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Hearing Assessment After Total Annular Excision Tympanoplasty- Our Institutional Experience

Agarwal

Chandra

2023

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Microscopic Over-under Versus Medial Tympanoplasty for Larger Tympanic Membrane Perforations

Zhang

et al. 2022

Ear Nose Throat J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To identify the differences in hearing, anatomical success rate, functional success rate, and complications between over-under tympanoplasty and medial tympanoplasty procedures. Methods The clinical data of patients with tympanic membrane perforation repaired by medial tympanoplasty between January 2011 and December 2016 and by over-under tympanoplasty between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the differences between medial tympanoplasty and over-under tympanoplasty. Results The overall success rate of over-under tympanoplasty was higher than that of medial tympanoplasty (90.76% vs 81.31%). In large perforations, the success rate of over-under tympanoplasty was higher than that of medial tympanoplasty (89.80% vs 71.43%). There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate between the two treatment groups for moderate perforations. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P = .2637). Conclusions Over-under tympanoplasty is more suitable for large perforations of the tympanic membrane and has a higher success rate as compared to medial tympanoplasty.

show abstract

Longitudinal Study of Type I Interlay Tympanoplasty

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

Interlay Technique Tympanoplasty: Surgical Difficulties with Variable Grafts

Interlay Technique Tympanoplasty: Surgical Difficulties with Variable Grafts

Hearing Assessment After Total Annular Excision Tympanoplasty- Our Institutional Experience

Microscopic Over-under Versus Medial Tympanoplasty for Larger Tympanic Membrane Perforations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About