Due to the increase in prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury, various models of self-injury have been proposed. Researchers have found empirical support for components of these models but have not explored the models in their entirety, nor supported them through the voices of participants. Eighty-eight participants' experiences of non-suicidal self-injury were explored in the current study, providing support for the existing models of self-injury by Nock and Chapman and colleagues, as well as support for Joiner's (2005) suggestion that self-injury can desensitize individuals to suicide. However, through content analysis and correlations, new categories emerged from participants' stories that have not been included in previous models, as well as suggested pathways within the existing models. Implications for counselors are proposed.
Keywords: Thought & thinking | Personal space | Personality; Consciousness | Human beings
Article:Due to the increase in prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury, various models of self-injury have been proposed. Researchers have found empirical support for components of these models but have not explored the models in their entirety, nor supported them through the voices of participants. Eighty-eight participants' experiences of non-suicidal self-injury were explored in the current study, providing support for the existing models of self-injury by Nock and Chapman and colleagues, as well as support for Joiner's (2005) suggestion that self-injury can desensitize individuals to suicide. However, through content analysis and correlations, new categories emerged from participants' stories that have not been included in previous models, as well as suggested pathways within the existing models. Implications for counselors are proposed.Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI; defined as intentionally causing immediate tissue damage to oneself; Ross & Heath, 2002), has increased in prevalence. Rates among young adults in a college population were found to increase from 18% in the early 2000s to 25% by 2011 (Simeon & Favazza, 2001; Wester, Ivers, Villalba, & Trepal, in press). More importantly, from 2008 to 2011, rates of NSSI were found to quadruple from 2.6% to 11.0% among students who reported engaging in NSSI within the past 90 days (Wester, 2014). General population rates were also found to increase from 18% to 46.5% over the past 30 years (Favazza, 1989;Lloyd-Richardson, Perrine, Dierker, & Kelley, 2007).Conceptual frameworks have been created to better understand NSSI behaviors. Chapman, Gratz, and Brown (2006) described the Experiential Avoidance Model (EAM), specifically stating that NSSI results from the expe-rience of intense negative affect combined with the inability to tolerate distress or regulate emotion. Nock (2009) absorbed Chapman et al.'s EAM into his Integrated Theoretical Model (ITM) of development and maintenance of NSSI. More specifically, the EAM seems to link into Nock's intrapersonal factors, which include high aversive emotions and cognitions with poor distress tolerance. No...