2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal neuroanatomical changes determined by deformation-based morphometry in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
117
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That optimization and the smaller voxels needed for the mouse brain required 12-24 h scan times, which raised the practical need to image multiple mice in the same scan [107,127]. Furthermore, improved image analysis techniques [94,108,111,128] and mouse atlases [129] were created to aid in the neuroanatomical analysis of the mouse. All of these improvements allowed dramatic advances in the neuroanatomical assessments in mouse model of human disease.…”
Section: Initial Investigations With Mri (1994-2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That optimization and the smaller voxels needed for the mouse brain required 12-24 h scan times, which raised the practical need to image multiple mice in the same scan [107,127]. Furthermore, improved image analysis techniques [94,108,111,128] and mouse atlases [129] were created to aid in the neuroanatomical analysis of the mouse. All of these improvements allowed dramatic advances in the neuroanatomical assessments in mouse model of human disease.…”
Section: Initial Investigations With Mri (1994-2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method allowed a greater specificity in order to determine subtle changes that may or may not have been seen in the previous in vivo examinations. In 2010, the Fmr1 KO mouse was revisited on a C57BL/6 J background using highresolution MRI [130], which reported volumes for 62 different brains regions [129], encompassing the whole brain, as well as voxel-wise differences that highlight local differences found within those regions [128]. Similar to the initial Fmr1 examination by Kooy et al [115], no differences were found in total brain volume.…”
Section: Recent Investigations (2010-14)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance images were acquired with a 7-T Bruker Pharmascan system (Bruker Biospin, Ettlingen, Germany) using a 28-mm inner-diameter quadrature volume resonator, and a three-dimensional TrueFISP (True fast imaging with steady-state precession) sequence with the following parameters: matrix size = 128 Â 128 Â 64, field of view = 1.8 Â 1.8 Â 0.9 cm 3 , spatial resolution = 140 Â 140 Â 140 mm 3 , excitation flip angle = 301, repetition time = 5.2 milliseconds, echo time = 2.6 milliseconds, number of excitations (NEX) = 4, number of phase cycles = 4, and total scan time = 35 minutes. The images were reconstructed using a maximum intensity algorithm, and the population averages were generated using the approach described by Lau et al (2008). Evoked CGU was expressed as a SUV ratio of the maximally activated somatosensory cortex (contralateral to whisker stimulation) to the analogous area of the ipsilateral cortex.…”
Section: -Deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-d-glucose-positron-emission Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images were reconstructed using a maximum intensity algorithm and the population averages generated using the approach described elsewhere. 26 Regions of interest were drawn on the somatosensory cortices and the magnitude of activation expressed as the ratio of […”
Section: F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-petmentioning
confidence: 99%