“…There are several theories to explain the development of the pseudoaneurysm [9]. Infection [10–16], degeneration of the artery [10, 12, 17–27], aseptic necrosis at the anastomotic line [28, 29], extensive endarterectomy, [10, 12, 14, 30, 31], large anastomosis or patch [10, 14, 32], the way that the anastomosis was performed [14, 33, 34], the length of the graft [35], adhesion with surrounding structures [34], mismatch between vessels [36–38], and combinations of these situations have been widely discussed. It is not clear which of the aforementioned was responsible for the development of the pseudoaneurysm in our patient, although it is likely that the significantly larger autogenous vein graft may have caused mechanical stress on the proximal anastomosis and contributed to the formation of the pseudoaneurysm.…”