2019
DOI: 10.1002/mus.26648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal follow‐up of biopsy‐proven small fiber neuropathy

Abstract: Introduction Little is published on the prognosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN). Methods A retrospective analysis of 101 patients with biopsy proven SFN. Results Study participants included 87 patients with length‐dependent SFN and 14 patients with non–length‐dependent SFN. The average duration of symptoms was 3.2 years prior to SFN diagnosis, and the average follow‐up duration after diagnosis was 6.2 years. Neuropathic pain was present in 98% of patients and in 84.2% of patients at the final visit. The aver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Ziegler et al found that over a 2.5‐y follow‐up period about half the patients with polyneuropathy experience increasing sensory symptoms and pain 19 . In addition, in a longitudinal follow‐up study of patients with small fiber neuropathy, with an average follow‐up duration after diagnosis of 6.2 y, 86.1% noted pain at the initial visit, and 84.2% at the final visit 20 . It has previously been shown that some patients with small fiber neuropathy may develop large fiber neuropathy over time 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Ziegler et al found that over a 2.5‐y follow‐up period about half the patients with polyneuropathy experience increasing sensory symptoms and pain 19 . In addition, in a longitudinal follow‐up study of patients with small fiber neuropathy, with an average follow‐up duration after diagnosis of 6.2 y, 86.1% noted pain at the initial visit, and 84.2% at the final visit 20 . It has previously been shown that some patients with small fiber neuropathy may develop large fiber neuropathy over time 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, MacDonald S et al [24] reported a retrospective analysis of 101 patients with biopsy-confirmed SFN, and the average follow-up was 6.2 years. They found that small fibre neuropathy tended to be stable and rarely affected ambulation and employment status.…”
Section: Follow-up and Outcome Of Pure Sfn And Mixed Dpn Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different treatments were experienced. Opioid analgesics [8,21,24] or nonopioid analgesic [22,26], corticosteroids [8,10,33,34,37,44], intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone [8,12,15,23,27,31,37,39,46,47] or in combination with other specific drugs, such as azathioprine [29], anti-epileptic drugs [4,11,13,16,18,28,32], immunotherapy [14,19,37], hormone therapy [7,43]. Less used are the following therapeutic strategies, in used for specific disorders, such as ARA290, an erythropoietin derivate for sarcoidosis SFN [45], recombinant human nerve growth factor for diabetic SFN [5], propranolol for SFN related to aquagenic pruritus [9], plasma exchange therapy for complex regional pain syndrome [6], enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry related SFN [17,35], botulinum toxin type A for keloid [38].…”
Section: Pharmacologic and Rehabilitation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of neuropathic pain has been a challenging task for physicians [24]. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of specific medications for the treatment of pain associated with SFN, and the most commonly used medications include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, mexiletine, topical agents, opiates and neuromodulation [54,55].…”
Section: The Pharmacological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%