The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2009
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Construct Validity of the GMFM-88 Total Score and Goal Total Score and the GMFM-66 Score in a 5-Year Follow-up Study

Abstract: All 3 scoring options showed large longitudinal construct validity in the long-term follow-up. The GMFM-88 total and goal total scores revealed large changes in gross motor function earlier postoperatively than the GMFM-66 scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Muscle strength was evaluated by the physiotherapist. Grading was according to the gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM‐88) . The GMFM‐88 is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle strength was evaluated by the physiotherapist. Grading was according to the gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM‐88) . The GMFM‐88 is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor ability was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88 or GMFM) [22] questionnaire. An example was shown in Additional file 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMFM‐66 is one version, in which a child’s gross motor function is observed and tested against 66 standardized items. It has been found to be valid and reliable for children with CP and has good longitudinal construct validity 19–21 . GMFM‐66 scores were obtained using the Gross Motor Ability Estimator 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%