1983
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/38.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Age Changes in Vigilance Over An Eighteen Year Interval

Abstract: An 18-year longitudinal repeat of the Mackworth Clock vigilance experiment was conducted. Skin potential response latencies (SPRL) and reaction times were taken from 33 men during the vigilance task. The longitudinal change in this study reproduced the earlier cross-sectional relationship. The 51 to 69 year olds showed faster reaction times, the 70 to 88 year olds showed slower reaction times and, the 70 to 88 year olds detected significantly fewer targets than when 18 years younger. It was found that the grea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive longitudinal study by Quilter et al (1983), in which observers were tested over a period of several years, suggested that there was a marked fall in detection efficiency at or around the age of 70 years. However, this finding was not confirmed in a later longitudinal study by Giambra and Quilter (1988) in which age differences in detection accuracy were not observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive longitudinal study by Quilter et al (1983), in which observers were tested over a period of several years, suggested that there was a marked fall in detection efficiency at or around the age of 70 years. However, this finding was not confirmed in a later longitudinal study by Giambra and Quilter (1988) in which age differences in detection accuracy were not observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aging has been associated with declines in CDA in healthy, cognitively intact, older individuals in a number of experimental studies. Older adults (Ն 65 years old) had more difficulty than younger adults in attending to a stimulus in the presence of distraction (Madden, 1986;Rabbitt, 1965;Rogers, 1992), were less able to ignore distracting stimuli when performing various tasks (Barr & Giambra, 1990;McDowd & Filion, 1992;Zacks & Hasher, 1994), and were less able to sustain directed attention in an effortful task over time (Quilter, Giambra, & Benson, 1983). These findings suggest that aging is associated with loss of efficiency in directing attention, particularly when experiencing multiple demands or high distraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six reasons on which, for instance, Welford (1977) bases his model were drawn from laboratory experiments. These experiments imply, for instance, that older subjects show a decreased ability to:control technical processes (“vigilance effect” Quilter et al , 1983, significant from 70 years on! );memorise meaningless syllables (Macht and Buschke, 1983); andrecognise unfamiliar faces (Ferris et al , 1980).…”
Section: Two Conceptions Of the Age/performance Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…control technical processes (“vigilance effect” Quilter et al , 1983, significant from 70 years on! );…”
Section: Two Conceptions Of the Age/performance Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%