Longevity of Self-etch Dentin Bonding Adhesives Compared to Etch-and-rinse Dentin Bonding Adhesives: A Systematic Review

Masarwa, Nader; Mohamed, Ahmed; AbouRabii, Iyad; Zaghlan, Rawan Abu; Steier, Liviu

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.03.003

Cited by 63 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The conventional dentin adhesives, which need a conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid, are etch-and-rinse bonding systems [3][4][5]. There is also a sub-classification according to the number of steps, which are provided in the application [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Six dentin adhesives were tested in vitro regarding their cytotoxicity on human fibroblasts. The adhesives Hybrid Bond, One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Solo Plus and Syntac were eluted with culture medium as single or sequentially applied adhesive part for 24 h. 75 Petri dishes were produced per group. They were evaluated triangulated, comprising the quantitative evaluation (105 ones) to determine “viable”, “dead” and “debris” cells with the use of a cell-counter and the reactivity index was also identified based on the qualitative assessment (420 ones). One-up Bond F Plus, AdheSE and Clearfil SE Bond showed a statistical difference of viable cells to the cell control. For One-up Bond F Plus, statistically, differences compared to hybrid bond and Syntac were also found. All the adhesives except One-up Bond F Plus showed significant differences between single and sequentially applied adhesive part regarding the quantitative evaluation. The test material showed a moderate grade of cytotoxicity. As a result, a statistically significant difference of the cytotoxicity between the self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives cannot be demonstrated regarding the qualitative evaluation and the reactivity index, but the differences between sequentially applied and single applied components can be proved.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the ER adhesive system has shown better values in a meta-analysis by Masarwa N et al, compared to the SE system, the authors did not find any significant difference in the longevity of the restorations made with the two types of adhesive techniques [20].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 89%

Study of Marginal Microleakage in Root Caries Restored with Resin Composites, Giomers and Glass Ionomer Cements

Dawod¹,

Bîcleşanu²,

Paluta³

et al. 2017

Mat.Plast.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Root decay is a complex and multifactorial disease. The aim of this study is to assess in vitro the sealing capacity of common aesthetic materials used to restore root caries as well as the size of the hybrid layer formed by SE-1 step vs 2-step ER adhesive techniques. For this study, 45 extracted teeth were used. After cleaning, near the enamel-cement junction, but at the level of the cementum, cavities were prepared and restored with resin composite, giomer and glass-ionomer cements. The teeth were covered with nail polish leaving uncovered the restoration area and 2mm around it; teeth were kept for 24 h , in 2% methylene blue. To assess the degree of marginal adaptation, SEM analysis was further performed. The association of 2-step ER adhesive system with giomers and resin composite shows the maximum adhesion efficiency by forming a uniform, thick layer and dentinal tubules obliteration compared to SE-1 step adhesive system associated with the same restoration materials.

show abstract

“…In dental literature, etch-and-rinse bonding systems tend to provide higher bond strength than self-etching ones 27 . Ultra-morphologically, there is a marked difference between the hybrid layers of these adhesive techniques bonded to dentin 28 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength of composite resin containing biomaterial S-PRG to eroded dentin

Lourenço¹,

Ayres²,

Mantilla³

et al. 2017

Braz. J. Oral Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of composite resin containing or not biomaterial (S-PRG) to sound/eroded dentine. Methods: Occlusal dentin of 30 human molars (n=15) had half of its surface kept uneroded, while on the other half an erosive lesion was produced by cycling in citric acid (pH 2.3) and supersaturated solution (pH 7.0). On both eroded (ED) and non-eroded (SD) substrates, two restorative systems (containing or not S-PRG) were tested. Composite resin cylinders were built and, after storage in water (24h), were submitted to bond strength test. The analysis of the fracture pattern was performed under an optical microscope (40x). The obtained values of bond strength (MPa) were submitted to ANOVA (two factors) and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (p<0.05). Results: According to the results, there was difference between substrates (<0.001) and restorative materials (p=0.002) evaluated. For the microtensile bond strength, the values obtained were: SDNB (47.6±12.2 MPa), SDWB (34.1±15.8 MPa), EDNB (31.1±8.3 MPa) and EDWB (15.5±13.6 MPa), revealing a statistically significant difference in the evaluated substrates and restorative materials. Conclusion: Bond strength of eroded substrate is inferior to the sound substrate and the restorative system containing S-PRG biomaterial influences negatively the results of bonding to sound/eroded dentin.

show abstract

Longevity of Self-etch Dentin Bonding Adhesives Compared to Etch-and-rinse Dentin Bonding Adhesives: A Systematic Review

Cited by 63 publications

References 15 publications

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

Cytotoxicity of Self-Etch Versus Etch-and-Rinse Dentin Adhesives: A Screening Study

Study of Marginal Microleakage in Root Caries Restored with Resin Composites, Giomers and Glass Ionomer Cements

Bond strength of composite resin containing biomaterial S-PRG to eroded dentin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About