2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2006.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term trends in foF2: A comparison of various methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
89
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(62 reference statements)
13
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method adopted to analyse the f oF 2 data was derived from Bremer (1992) and has been successively used by several authors (see, e.g., Lastovicka et al, 2006). The main steps of our data selection and processing are the followings: a) Selection of the "full-weight" f oF 2 hourly data, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method adopted to analyse the f oF 2 data was derived from Bremer (1992) and has been successively used by several authors (see, e.g., Lastovicka et al, 2006). The main steps of our data selection and processing are the followings: a) Selection of the "full-weight" f oF 2 hourly data, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Regarding experimental values, a major debate in the matter of trend detection in the ionosphere is the methodology used to extract these trends from the experimental data [Lastovicka et al, 2006b], which ends in complex global patterns and different results among different authors. According to Bremer [2004Bremer [ , 2008, who used the same method as in the present paper to extract trends, the experimental global mean f o E trend is positive, agreeing with the greenhouse effect prediction, but is stronger than the model results.…”
Section: Trends Due To Increasing Greenhouse Gas Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laštovička (jla@ufa.cas.cz) of the F2 layer. Unfortunately, the results of different authors differ substantially, even as to sign and possible origin of long-term change in foF2 (see, e.g., brief review in Laštovička et al, 2006b;Yue et al, 2006). The determination and/or estimation of long-term trends in foF2 are difficult due to the overlapping effect of the 11-year solar cycle, which is many times larger than the effect of long-term trends over the 11 year period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%