1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41809-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Therapy with a Depot Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Analogue (Zoladex) in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma

Abstract: We treated 191 patients with histologically proved locally advanced stage (T3 or T4) and/or metastatic prostate cancer with a biodegradable depot formulation of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (Zoladex). After an initial increase in serum testosterone in week 1 of therapy a continuous decrease of testosterone to castrate levels was obtained. With a monthly injection of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue 4 patients (2 per cent) experienced a transient increase in bone pain, 1 ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other generally smaller studies have indicated no improvements in survival or interval to disease progression for maximal an drogen blockade compared to castration.2>10 ' 15-18 In our study orchiectomy was chosen rather than luteiniz ing hormone-releasing hormone agonists not only to avoid any compliance problems relating to the method of castration but also to avoid disease flare found in up to 5% of patients receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists as monotherapy. 19 This choice also allows the long-term efficacy of the antiandrogen to be related to its self-effect rather than to the prevention of disease flare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, other generally smaller studies have indicated no improvements in survival or interval to disease progression for maximal an drogen blockade compared to castration.2>10 ' 15-18 In our study orchiectomy was chosen rather than luteiniz ing hormone-releasing hormone agonists not only to avoid any compliance problems relating to the method of castration but also to avoid disease flare found in up to 5% of patients receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists as monotherapy. 19 This choice also allows the long-term efficacy of the antiandrogen to be related to its self-effect rather than to the prevention of disease flare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also most unlikely that any increase in bone pain is a sign of a new osteoblastic lesion; it probably reflects a minor and temporary stim ulation of a pre-existing lesion. Although Debruyne [12] did describe 1 patient with acute paralysis of the legs fol lowing such treatment this was also probably the result of terminal erosion of a pre-existing spinal deposit. In our study, only 1 patient needed bladder catheteriza tion, though in the study of Parmar, using a different analog, there were more urinary symptoms [5], Hot flashes, breast tenderness, loss of libido and impotence can be considered as physiologic hormonal side-effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with LHRH analogue monotherapy, the incidence of tumour flare is generally higher (5%) [43], During combination therapy, the incidence of hepatic events was lower in Casodex-LHRH analogue treated patients than in flutamide-LHRH analogue treated pa tients (6.2% versus 10.3%, respectively). By comparison, the incidence of hepatic adverse events in the entire monotherapy programme of studies was 1.5% in Casodex-treated patients compared with 1.1% in castrated pa tients.…”
Section: Clinical Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%