2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term test–retest reliability of functional MRI in a classification learning task

Abstract: Functional MRI is widely used for imaging the neural correlates of psychological processes and how these brain processes change with learning, development and neuropsychiatric disorder. In order to interpret changes in imaging signals over time, for example, in patient studies, the long-term reliability of fMRI must first be established. Here, eight healthy adult subjects were scanned on two sessions, 1 year apart, while performing a classification learning task known to activate frontostriatal circuitry. We s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
143
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(60 reference statements)
17
143
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is remarkable considering that measurements were separated by at least 4 months (up to 19 months for the subjects who participated in Study 1 and Study 3) and that different tasks were employed (variants of the task-switching paradigm and the Stroop task). Thus, our results are in line with another study that provided evidence for a high long-term reliability of fMRI data [Aron et al, 2006]. A limitation of our analysis is that conditions were contrasted against null events.…”
Section: Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result is remarkable considering that measurements were separated by at least 4 months (up to 19 months for the subjects who participated in Study 1 and Study 3) and that different tasks were employed (variants of the task-switching paradigm and the Stroop task). Thus, our results are in line with another study that provided evidence for a high long-term reliability of fMRI data [Aron et al, 2006]. A limitation of our analysis is that conditions were contrasted against null events.…”
Section: Reliabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.] working memory and learning indicating that individual difference was not significant across subjects (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). However, several acupuncture studies inferred that the influence of individual difference should be taken into consideration (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Four images at the beginning of each run were discarded to allow T1 equilibration. The behavioral task and the image acquisition parameters are fully described in (Aron et al, 2006).…”
Section: Training and Test Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was added to a set of regions that are generally activated during categorization tasks (caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, thalamus, orbital,lateral and medial frontal cortex) (Aron et al, 2006)). The ROIs were extracted by registering the BOLD scan to a T2-weighted anatomical scan of the subject, and thereafter registering the T2-weighted scan to the T2-weighted single subject BrainWeb image (Collins et al, 1998).…”
Section: Effects Of Denoising To Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%