2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Survival of Patients With Heart Failure and Ventricular Conduction Delay Treated With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
65
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
65
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-hundred and thirtyseven were retrieved for analysis of titles and abstracts and 49 of these were selected for further analysis of the full-length article. Eighteen were considered eligible for inclusion 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
Section: Search Results and Patients' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-hundred and thirtyseven were retrieved for analysis of titles and abstracts and 49 of these were selected for further analysis of the full-length article. Eighteen were considered eligible for inclusion 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
Section: Search Results and Patients' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by a large multicenter prospective study. 37 In addition, significant mitral regurgitation (grade >2+) post-CRT was found to be independently associated with all-cause mortality, as also described in the Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure Trial 38 and by van Bommel et al 39 Another clinical parameter with impact on mortality was hospitalization due to HF during the first year of follow-up. The importance of HF admissions after CRT was also shown by Bertini et al, 20 and data from the MADIT-CRT trial revealed an association between future events and HF admission during the 12 months before CRT implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In Europe, 24% of CRT recipients are women [78], and the corresponding figure in the USA is 22-26% [73], with women comprising 17-24% [79][80][81][82] in larger registry studies of CRT. Although CRT appears to be underutilized in women, the reason for this is unclear.…”
Section: Gender Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MADIT-CRT study, the HR for death or HF for CRT-D compared with ICD alone was 0.31 for women and 0.72 for men (P for interaction < 0.01) [65,85]. In single-centre register studies, female gender was protective in some [80,81,86,87] but not in others [79]. In MADIT-CRT, the better prognosis amongst women may be related to baseline differences: women had higher rates of HF of nonischaemic aetiology, LBBB and use of b-blockers but lower rates of right bundle branch block (RBBB), atrial fibrillation (AF) and renal dysfunction.…”
Section: Gender Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%