MT proved to be an effective system. Patients with typical AMI presentation, ST elevation myocardial infarction and less than 70 years old are protected by MT, with lower ITTFO and better short-term survival.

Among patients with heart failure with indications for CRT, those with DCM may not benefit from additional primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, as opposed to those with ICM.

Premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy is a potentially reversible condition in which left ventricular dysfunction is induced by the occurrence of frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Various cellular and extracellular mechanisms and risk factors for developing cardiomyopathy in this context have been suggested but the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear. The suppression of PVCs is usually indicated in symptomatic patients with frequent PVCs and also those with left ventricular dysfunction. Antiarrhythmic drugs are a useful non-invasive treatment to eliminate PVCs, but the side effect profile, including the risk of pro-arrhythmia, along with suboptimal clinical effectiveness, should be weighed against the usually more effective but not risk-free treatment with catheter ablation. The latter has progressively become first line therapy in many patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy and should be particularly considered in specific scenarios.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist. However, the extent to which CKD increases the risk of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and the benefits of anticoagulation in this group remain unclear. We addressed the role of CKD in the prediction of thromboembolic events and the impact of anticoagulation using a meta-analysis method. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane (from inception to January 2014). Three independent reviewers selected studies. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted from each selected study and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Thromboembolic events are one of the most feared complications of atrial fibrillation (AF). 1 Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is relatively prevalent in patients with AF. 2 The extent to which the presence of CKD may increase the risk of thromboembolism in patients with AF has not yet been fully elucidated. Oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of thromboembolic prevention in patients with AF, 3 but data on efficacy and safety in the CKD and dialysis population have been scarce and contradictory. 4,5 Our aim was to systematically evaluate, through a meta-analysis method, the impact of the presence of CKD in patients with AF as regards risk of thromboembolism and the potential benefit of anticoagulation in that setting. MethodsWe performed a search in MEDLINE (by way of Ovid and PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane (from inception to January 3, 2014) databases using the following search string: "atrial fibrillation" AND ("renal failure" OR "chronic renal disease" OR "dialysis") AND ("stroke" OR "thromboembolism"). The reference lists of the accessed full-text reports were further researched for sources of potential information relevant to this analysis. The authors of full-text reports and abstracts were contacted by e-mail to retrieve additional information.Only longitudinal studies assessing the occurrence of a composite end point of stroke or systemic embolism (and including transient ischemic attack) during follow-up in patients with AF were considered for inclusion. Both registries and randomized trials were considered eligible for analysis. The methods sections of evaluated studies were reviewed to confirm the suitability and composition of the reported end point. Studies assessing only stroke (either ischemic, hemorrhagic, or a composite of both) and providing no data on systemic embolism were not considered representative of the full spectrum of thromboembolism in AF and were excluded from analysis. Similarly, studies only reporting stroke or systemic embolism in association with myocardial infarction, hospitalization, or death not due to stroke or systemic embolism were not included.

BackgroundLeft atrial (LA) size is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients in sinus rhythm, whereas conflicting results have been found in atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to: (1) Evaluate the accuracy of LA size to identify surrogate markers of an increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF; (2) Assess the best method to evaluate LA size in this setting.MethodsCross-sectional study enrolling 500 consecutive patients undergoing transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography evaluation during a non-valvular AF episode. LA size was measured on transthoracic echocardiography using several methods: anteroposterior diameter, area in four-chamber view, and volumes by the ellipsoid, single- and biplane area-length formulas. Surrogate markers of stroke were evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography: LA appendage (LAA) thrombus, LAA low flow velocities, dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and LA abnormality.ResultsExcept for non-indexed anteroposterior diameter, increased LA size quantified by all the other methods showed a moderate to high discriminatory power to identify all the surrogate markers of stroke. A higher accuracy was observed for indexed LA area in four-chamber view (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.708, CI95% 0.644- 0.772, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.733, CI95% 0.674- 0.793, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.693, CI95% 0.638- 0.748, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.705, CI95% 0.654-0.755, p<0.001), indexed single-plane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.701, CI95% 0.633-0.770, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.726, CI95% 0.660-0.792, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.673, CI95% 0.611-0.736, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.687, CI95% 0.629-0.744, p<0.001), and indexed biplane area-length volume (LAA thrombus: AUC = 0.707, CI95% 0.626-0.788, p<0.001; LAA low flow velocities: AUC = 0.737, CI95% 0.664-0.810, p<0.001; dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast: AUC = 0.651, CI95% 0.578-0.724, p<0.001; LA abnormality: AUC = 0.683, CI95% 0.617-0.749, p<0.001), without significant difference between them. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes also were independent predictors of surrogate markers of stroke.ConclusionsLeft atrium enlargement is associated with an increased prevalence of surrogate markers of stroke in patients with non-valvular AF. Indexed LA area in four-chamber view and indexed area-length volumes displayed the strongest association.

No abstract

Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We comprehensively reviewed the state-of-the-art data regarding the applicability, safety, clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the ICD in elderly patients, and analysed which patients in this age stratum are more likely to get a survival benefit from this therapy. Although peri-procedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, this procedure is still relatively safe in this age group. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantage of the device on arrhythmic death may be largely attenuated by a higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in highly selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD intervention among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live >5-7 years after implantation. Biological age rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factor in making a decision on ICD selection for survival benefit.

The ScREEN score (Sex category, Renal function, ECG/QRS width, Ejection fraction and NYHA class) is composed of widely validated, easy to obtain predictors of CRT response, and predicts CRT response and overall mortality. It should be helpful in facilitating early consideration of alternative therapies for predicted non-responders to CRT therapy.