2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of stent graft treatment of subclavian artery injuries: Management of choice for stable patients?

Abstract: This study has reaffirmed the feasibility and safety of stent graft repair in treating stable patients with selected penetrating subclavian artery injuries. The results of this study also confirmed acceptable long-term follow-up without any limb or life threatening complications. We conclude that endovascular repair should be considered the first choice of treatment in stable patients with subclavian artery injuries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
80
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3) The present case confirms that association, as the EVT provided rapid resolution of the patient's symptoms in an emergent setting (without the risk of brachial plexus injury during open repair). However, EVT can also result in stent deformity or fracture, [4][5][6] and this complication may be related to several factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3) The present case confirms that association, as the EVT provided rapid resolution of the patient's symptoms in an emergent setting (without the risk of brachial plexus injury during open repair). However, EVT can also result in stent deformity or fracture, [4][5][6] and this complication may be related to several factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…5) The second factor is frequent vessel mobility that is caused by upper limb movement, as frequent flexion and extension can cause stent fatigue and fracture. Although self-expanding stents are expected to be more resistant to external forces (vs. stainless steel stents), 3) they are still prone to fracture, with reported fracture intervals of 4 months to 2 years. [4][5][6] However, the stent graft perforation and fracture in the present case occurred at postoperative day 5, and the injuries occurred at almost the same site in the axillary artery (before and after stent graft placement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some reports of months) 9 . Among them, five patients showed significant stenosis (>50%), and three patients showed stent graft oc-clusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All stenosis lesions were treated by angioplasty and were found to be patent during the follow-up. All occlusive lesions were treated conservatively, with no requirement for open surgery to improve symptoms or to achieve limb salvage during the long-term follow-up 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] However, application of covered endovascular endoprostheses in the subclavian artery has been more widely accepted as a reliable minimally invasive modality to exclude arteriovenous fistulas and aneurysms, facilitating a reduction in hospitalization time and blood loss and avoiding the need for general anesthesia. [13][14][15] In a recent study of du Toit et al [16] concerning the long-term results of stent graft treatment of subclavian artery injuries with a mean follow-up period of 49 months, significant stenosis or occlusion occurred in eight of the 25 patients available for long-term followup. These patients all presented with non-incapacitating claudication, and the stenotic lesions were all treated successfully with angioplasty and remained patent on follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%