Long-term results of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a technique to harvest pure calvarial cancellous bone: Evaluation based on plain radiography and computed tomography

Han, Kihwan; Jeong, Woonhyeok; Yeo, Hyeonjung; Choi, Jaehoon; Kim, Junhyung; Son, Daegu; Oh, Sang Ho; Kim, Changhyun

doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.10.018

Cited by 18 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the international literature 75% of patients treated with grafting had a tomographic integration of 26-75% [11], in this study a greater integration was obtained taking into account the fi nal x-ray to more than 4 months with 14 cases with a scale Chelsea A (73.38%) and 3 cases Chelsea B While the support for orthopaedic treatment is clear, one particular case was negatively affected by orthodontic treatment, which coincides with studies reporting a resorption between 14 and 100% with an average of 36.46% [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 63%

Radiographic evaluation of secondary alveolar graff in the closure of alveolar fissures of patients with cleft lip and palate

C¹,

Roberto²

2020

Int J Oral Craniofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The X-ray evaluation of alveolar bone graft in lip-toveal palatines is one of the relevant topics in the management of this type of pathology since there are several studies conducted with parameters that are taken to determine the timing of the graft and its feasibility, as well as fi nd the most accurate form and measure the integration of grafting dares of radiographic studies. Objective: to measure the radiographic integration of secondary alveolar graft in the closure of alveolar fi ssures of patients with cleft lip and palate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 63%

Radiographic evaluation of secondary alveolar graff in the closure of alveolar fissures of patients with cleft lip and palate

C¹,

Roberto²

2020

Int J Oral Craniofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a few other articles, 2D images such as dental, occlusal, and panoramic radiographs and a lateral cephalogram were taken as well. 6,17,23,34,38,39,41 In one publication, a panoramic radiograph was reconstructed out of the CBCT scan. 25 Concerning the timing of these images, we observed that four studies 16,20,35,42 took pre-operative 3D images only, mostly when the main objective was surgical planning.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only four studies evaluated the bone graft over a time span of more than 1 year. 7,14,30,39 The longest longitudinal follow-up period was 3 years. 7 The longest cross-sectional follow-up period was 20 years.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Mulder

Llano-Pérula

Jacobs

et al. 2019

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The search yielded 1735 citations, of which 38 met the inclusion criteria. We noticed a large variability in imaging protocols and bone graft evaluation methods between studies. Most articles were observational studies with medium to low methodological quality, except for the one randomised clinical trial having a low risk of bias. Conclusions: There is a lack of prospective, controlled trials based on a consistent imaging protocol with a sufficiently long follow-up period. A pressing need exists for the development of a consistent optimized imaging protocol for diagnosis and follow up of SABG in CLP patients. Although 3D evaluation methods seem to be more precise than two-dimensional methods, we should be careful when comparing the outcomes arising from different 3D measuring techniques.

show abstract

“…In summary, although traditional radiographic evaluation has multiple advantages, including easy application, low cost, and the relatively low radiation doses involved, studies have limited accuracy because of structural overlap, distortion, and magnification. 33,44 Moreover, alveolar thickness varies in CT analyses despite the apparent evidence of successful results obtained with traditional radiography. CT scans are required to determine the suitability of bone for dental implants and the potential movement of orthodontically manipulated teeth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 3 of the 11 studies, 2-D and 3-D radiographic evaluations were compared statistically. Han et al 33 evaluated SABG outcomes measured on planar radiographs by using the Enemark grading system. In total, 21 patients reached grade I, 5 reached grade II, 3 reached grade III, and 4 reached grade IV.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional radiologic evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting of clefts: a systematic review

Guo

2020

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) has become the principal means of treating alveolar cleft defects. We reviewed the literature on 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) radiographic evaluation of SABG in patients with cleft lip and alveolus (CLA) and those with cleft lip and palate (CLP), with a focus on outcomes. Study Design. We searched several electronic databases to the end of 2018. The inclusion criteria were nonsyndromic CLA or CLP treated with SABG at an optimal age and evaluation performed no earlier than 3 months postoperatively. Study quality was evaluated by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results. We identified 282 articles from 3 databases. Full texts of 102 articles were analyzed, and finally 11 articles were included for qualitative analysis. 2-D and 3-D radiographic evaluations were performed in each study. Traditional 2-D radiographic imaging tended to overestimate success; bone resorption in the labiopalatal direction was inaccurate in 2-D views. Most articles were observational in nature and of moderate methodologic quality. Conclusions. 2-D evaluation tended to overestimate SABG outcomes; 3-D evaluation was more precise and reliable than 2-D radiography. A gold standard 3-D evaluation protocol is required for quantitative comparisons in the future. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020;130:455À463)

show abstract

Long-term results of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a technique to harvest pure calvarial cancellous bone: Evaluation based on plain radiography and computed tomography

Cited by 18 publications

References 23 publications

Radiographic evaluation of secondary alveolar graff in the closure of alveolar fissures of patients with cleft lip and palate

Radiographic evaluation of secondary alveolar graff in the closure of alveolar fissures of patients with cleft lip and palate

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional radiologic evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting of clefts: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About