2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-012-0284-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term quality of life after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Abstract: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has evolved as the surgical procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of UC patients who underwent this procedure over 5 years ago. Thirty-nine UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA were interviewed by the validated inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). Each patient was assigned a score, ranging from 32 to 224, in which the highest score… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is encouraging to see that despite the large number of colectomies, patient QoL did not appear to be adversely affected. This concurs with findings from other studies where surgery in UC patients did not result in adverse effects on QoL [26,27]. A recent study of 10-year long-term outcomes in UC patients following ileal pouch anal anastomosis similarly showed good QoL outcomes in most patients [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is encouraging to see that despite the large number of colectomies, patient QoL did not appear to be adversely affected. This concurs with findings from other studies where surgery in UC patients did not result in adverse effects on QoL [26,27]. A recent study of 10-year long-term outcomes in UC patients following ileal pouch anal anastomosis similarly showed good QoL outcomes in most patients [28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Twelve studies assessed QoL in a variety of different patient populations, using a range of different methods and questionnaires (Table S2). Six studies assessed QoL in postoperative IPAA cohorts alone [23,25,26,30,33,48], two compared QoL before and after surgery for IPAA [28,54], two compared postoperative cohorts of IPAA to ileostomy [29,39] and two compared IPAA to continued medical therapy [42,53]. Due to the large variability in QoL questionnaires used, the variation in study populations and also inter-study variation of analysis of questionnaires, a formal synthesis of results was not possible.…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies reported general health to be comparable to that of the general population [23,33] following IPAA surgery, whilst physical and mental health were reportedly lower than the general population [23]. Additionally, one study [48] reported QoL to be average or good in 97.4% of the cohort following IPAA surgery. Sexual desire and sexual satisfaction were reported to increase post-surgery [26], despite a different study reporting that there was no change in the quality of relationships after surgery [30].…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a surgical intervention is not always well-received by patients, who fear the process in itself and the occurrence of postoperative complications: the results of a survey published in 2007 revealed that, from 5,576 IBD patients (43.5% of whom with UC), 86.4% said they would rather try a new type of drug therapy then undergo surgery [17]. However, recent studies have demonstrated that surgery has generally a good outcome regarding the QoL of UC patients: Salehimarzijarani et al [18] have shown that 38.5 and 59% of patients who underwent an IPAA had a "good" (IBDQ between 151 and 199) and "regular" (IBDQ between 101 and 150) HRQoL, respectively, 5 years after the intervention. Moreover, Fazio et al [19] analyzed a large cohort of 3,707 patients, 79.7% of whom had UC, and determined that functional outcomes and QoL were good or excellent in 95% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%