2009
DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term prognosis of medically treated patients with functional mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction

Abstract: AimsTo assess long-term prognosis in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, receiving current standard pharmacological therapy. Methods and resultsWe prospectively enrolled 404 consecutive patients (mean age 70.2 + 10 years) with ischaemic (76.5%) and nonischaemic (23.5%) LV dysfunction (ejection fraction 34.4 + 10.8%) and at least mild MR. Results are reported at 4 years' follow-up. Survival free of all-cause mortality was 53% and cardiac death was 74%. Surv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In high-risk patient population, MVS is technically feasible but is associated with high rates of adverse events at 30 days. Severe MR (ischemic and non-ischemic) is associated with a poor prognosis [32]. MVS can be performed in selected patients treated with optimal medical therapy [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high-risk patient population, MVS is technically feasible but is associated with high rates of adverse events at 30 days. Severe MR (ischemic and non-ischemic) is associated with a poor prognosis [32]. MVS can be performed in selected patients treated with optimal medical therapy [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with idiopathic or post-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and is associated with a poor prognosis when treated conservatively [1,2]. Secondary MR is the result of left ventricular remodelling, and the presence and severity of secondary MR reflect the extent of underlying left ventricular dilation and dysfunction [3].…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Regardless of its etiology, severe MR is associated with progressive LV dysfunction and congestive heart failure, ultimately leading to high rates of morbidity and mortality. 4 Current guidelines recommend surgery for moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR in patients with symptoms or evidence of LV dysfunction. 5, 6 However, when the MR is secondary to underlying LV dysfunction (ie, FMR), the benefit of surgery is controversial.…”
Section: Leaflet Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%