2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02134-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term potentiation in the insular cortex enhances conditioned taste aversion retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3, 4). This accords well with studies suggesting that CTA may be underlain by plasticity in amygdala-cortical synapses (Escobar and Bermudez-Rattoni, 2000;Ferreira et al, 2005). For such a hypothesis to be considered feasible, however, it must be shown that CTA genuinely increases the functional connectivity between GC and BLA.…”
Section: Cta-induced Bla Response Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3, 4). This accords well with studies suggesting that CTA may be underlain by plasticity in amygdala-cortical synapses (Escobar and Bermudez-Rattoni, 2000;Ferreira et al, 2005). For such a hypothesis to be considered feasible, however, it must be shown that CTA genuinely increases the functional connectivity between GC and BLA.…”
Section: Cta-induced Bla Response Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Palatability-related information only appears in GC between 0.8 and 1.0 s after taste administration (Katz et al, 2001a); CTA, which changes taste palatability without affecting actual taste quality (Berridge and Robinson, 1998), would therefore be predicted to change only these later aspects of GC taste responses . Indirect evidence, meanwhile, suggests that activity in BLA, which is known to code palatability (Nishijo et al, 1998), may drive CTA-related activity and plasticity in GC (Escobar et al, 1998a,b;Escobar and Bermudez-Rattoni, 2000;Miranda et al, 2002;Ferreira et al, 2005). Thus, learning should change earlier aspects of BLA responses than GC responses [i.e., learning should change BLA responses produced Ͻ1 s after stimulus administration; for similar logic in fear conditioning, see Quirk et al (1997), Armony et al (1998), and Repa et al, 2001].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works in our laboratory and others have demonstrated the interaction between amygdala and insular cortex during taste aversive memory formation. Accordingly, high-frequency stimulation in the basolateral amygdala induced long term potenti-ation in the IC that enhances CTA consolidation (20,39,40), and these effects were completely blocked by NMDA antagonists (20). These results suggest that the functional connection between the basolateral amygdala and IC during taste aversion memory has a modulatory action on memory formation (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Interestingly, induction of this long-term potentiation in the BLA-IC projection before CTA training enhances memory retention [199].…”
Section: The Role Of the Amygdala In Taste Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%