Although temporal coding is a frequent topic of neurophysiology research, trial-to-trial variability in temporal codes is typically dismissed as noise and thought to play no role in sensory function. Here, we show that much of this supposed ''noise'' faithfully reflects stimulus-related processes carried out in coherent neural networks. Cortical neurons responded to sensory stimuli by progressing through sequences of states, identifiable only in examinations of simultaneously recorded ensembles. The specific times at which ensembles transitioned from state to state varied from trial to trial, but the state sequences were reliable and stimulusspecific. Thus, the characterization of ensemble responses in terms of state sequences captured facets of sensory processing that are missing from, and obscured in, other analyses. This work provides evidence that sensory neurons act as parts of a systems-level dynamic process, the nature of which can best be appreciated through observation of distributed ensembles.gustatory ͉ hidden Markov model T he time courses of sensory neural responses are rich with structure. Taking time into consideration increases the amount of information that can be extracted from neural codes (1-5) and changes the nature of that information (6-8). Such temporal complexity is the natural result of interactions among neural populations (9-11), a concept recently illustrated in studies of olfactory antennal lobe responses in insects (12)(13)(14).The behavior of mammalian sensory systems has proven more difficult to characterize, due in part to the relative complexity of these networks and of the behaviors and neural activity that they subtend. Feedback and convergence found in mammalian brains are extensive and diffuse (15), a fact that contributes to high trial-to-trial variability of mammalian cortical sensory responses (16). This variability is usually dismissed as noise, a decision formalized by the use of across-trial averages such as peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) (8) and compilations of sequentially recorded neurons (13) to characterize temporal codes.If the variability in neural responses is not noise, however [if, for instance, it reflects network processes evolving at different speeds from trial to trial (17, 18)], then trial-averaging techniques will obscure features of the underlying neural processes. Recent evidence indirectly suggests that this possibility may be the case: repeating multineuronal temporal patterns that are not reflected in PSTHs follow application of sensory stimuli (19, 20) and precede initiation of motor behaviors (21-23), although the search algorithms used to identify such patterns are controversial (24, 25); furthermore, the speed of perceptual identification itself varies from trial to trial (26, 27) in a manner linked to the dynamics of network activity (27)(28)(29)(30).Here, we provide direct evidence that trial-to-trial variability is a reliable, information-rich part of ensemble sensory processing in awake rats, by using hidden Markov models [HMM (31)...
Single-trial analyses of ensemble activity in alert animals demonstrate that cortical circuits dynamics evolve through temporal sequences of metastable states. Metastability has been studied for its potential role in sensory coding, memory, and decision-making. Yet, very little is known about the network mechanisms responsible for its genesis. It is often assumed that the onset of state sequences is triggered by an external stimulus. Here we show that state sequences can be observed also in the absence of overt sensory stimulation. Analysis of multielectrode recordings from the gustatory cortex of alert rats revealed ongoing sequences of states, where single neurons spontaneously attain several firing rates across different states. This single-neuron multistability represents a challenge to existing spiking network models, where typically each neuron is at most bistable. We present a recurrent spiking network model that accounts for both the spontaneous generation of state sequences and the multistability in single-neuron firing rates. Each state results from the activation of neural clusters with potentiated intracluster connections, with the firing rate in each cluster depending on the number of active clusters. Simulations show that the model's ensemble activity hops among the different states, reproducing the ongoing dynamics observed in the data. When probed with external stimuli, the model predicts the quenching of single-neuron multistability into bistability and the reduction of trial-by-trial variability. Both predictions were confirmed in the data. Together, these results provide a theoretical framework that captures both ongoing and evoked network dynamics in a single mechanistic model.
SUMMARY Animals are not passive spectators of the sensory world in which they live. In natural conditions they often sense objects on the bases of expectations initiated by predictive cues. Expectation profoundly modulates neural activity by altering the background state of cortical networks and modulating sensory processing. The link between these two effects is not known. Here, we studied how cue-triggered expectation of stimulus availability influences processing of sensory stimuli in the gustatory cortex (GC). We found that expected tastants were coded more rapidly than unexpected stimuli. The faster onset of sensory coding related to anticipatory priming of GC by associative auditory cues. Simultaneous recordings and pharmacological manipulations of GC and basolateral amygdala revealed the role of top-down inputs in mediating the effects of anticipatory cues. Altogether these data provide a new model for how cue-triggered expectation changes the state of sensory cortices to achieve rapid processing of natural stimuli.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.