“…Over the past two decades, a series of researches have been carried out to study the characteristics of climate proxies in Chinese loess-paleosol sequences, such as soil grain size, CaCO 3 content, magnetic susceptibility, organic carbon isotope, clay minerals and so on, which provided a wealth of information for the reconstruction of paleoenvironment and paleoclimate changes in the Quaternary ( Verosub et al, 1994 ; Gallet, Jahn & Torii, 1996 ; Ding et al, 2002 ; Kohfeld & Harrison, 2003 ; Kaakinen, Sonninen & Lunkka, 2006 ; Torrent et al, 2007 ; Jeong, Hillier & Kemp, 2011 ; Liu et al, 2011 ; Krauß et al, 2016 ; Schulte & Lehmkuhl, 2017 ). Previous results have showed that the changes in soil grain size on a Chinese loess-paleosol profile could reflect the winter monsoon intensity and the distance between source areas and sedimentary areas ( Chen et al, 1997 ; Nugteren & Vandenberghe, 2004 ; Sun et al, 2006 ; Prins et al, 2007 ; Guan et al, 2016 ; Zeng et al, 2017 ), and the distribution of CaCO 3 could indicate the level of precipitation controlled by East Asian monsoon and reflect the weathering intensity in the loess-paleosol sequence ( Chen et al, 1997 ; Zhao, Gu & Du, 2008 ; Babeesh et al, 2017 ). Therefore, soil grain size and CaCO 3 content of loess-paleosol sequences have been widely used as the paleoclimatic proxies in the Quaternary studies.…”