2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term performance of large borehole heat exchanger fields with unbalanced seasonal loads and groundwater flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that an almost complete heat load compensation is needed in the case of an infinite square BHE field, even when the spacing between the individual BHEs is large (14 m). A similar study of under groundwater flow was carried out by Zanchini et al [25]. These authors point out that the performance of a BHE field becomes more sustainable when the Peclet number increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…They concluded that an almost complete heat load compensation is needed in the case of an infinite square BHE field, even when the spacing between the individual BHEs is large (14 m). A similar study of under groundwater flow was carried out by Zanchini et al [25]. These authors point out that the performance of a BHE field becomes more sustainable when the Peclet number increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Numerical methods are common in ground heat exchanger research (e.g Fan et al, 2008, Zanchini et al, 2012 and allow consideration of many more configurations that can be addressed in practical experiments. However, most models are produced to consider specific case studies (e.g Knellwolf et al, 2011, Dupray et al, 2014, Sinnathamby, 2014 and do not take the opportunity to study the important general problem of optimisation guidance for designers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods have also been used to assess multiple ground heat exchangers, eg [29], [30]; this has the advantage of being able to assess bespoke geometries and arrangements of heat exchangers. However three dimensional models of many heat exchangers can be computationally expensive and hence 2D simplifications may be preferable.…”
Section: Multiple Heat Exchangersmentioning
confidence: 99%