2013
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes of autologous pubovaginal fascia slings: Is there a difference between primary and secondary slings?

Abstract: At long-term follow-up of average 7.4 years, primary and secondary PVS patients had comparable favourable functional outcomes with low morbidity. However, secondary PVS patients had lower success rates as per our definition with higher rate of additional procedures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment of SUI using autologous fascia is not a recent technique, having been introduced and popularized by McGuire and Lytton in 1970s . The pubovaginal autologous sling was the foundation of surgical treatment for SUI prior to introduction of the synthetic midurethral sling . Since the FDA warnings, however, new studies of autologous material for SUI treatment in women have been carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment of SUI using autologous fascia is not a recent technique, having been introduced and popularized by McGuire and Lytton in 1970s . The pubovaginal autologous sling was the foundation of surgical treatment for SUI prior to introduction of the synthetic midurethral sling . Since the FDA warnings, however, new studies of autologous material for SUI treatment in women have been carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al reported a success rate of secondary fascial slings of 65.7% using patient-reported outcomes and no reoperation as a definition of success [27]. Amaye-Obu and Drutz had reported objective and subjective cure rates for abdominovaginal polypropylene sling of 78% and 89%, "modified" urethral sling of 70% and 96%, and colposuspension of 73% and 88% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation affected 11% of our patients, while the majority (72%) had normal voiding characteristics on UDS after MUSR. In the group with normal voiding function, there was less concern in offering an autologous fascia sling than in those with UDA or Valsalva voiding . In the group with UDA or Valsalva voiding, injectable therapy was preferred over pubovaginal sling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%