Cite as: Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11(1-2):E19-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3872 Published online January 12, 2017 AbstractIntroduction: Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in the ischemia and reperfusion process. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of L-arginine, tadalafil, and their combination for prevention of the ischemia reperfusion injury after testis torsion in rats. Methods: A total of 40 adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated into five groups. Three hours of left testicular torsion was performed in each group, excluding the control group. While the ischemia reperfusion (I/R) group had no treatment, I/R + Arg group received L-arginine, I/R + Td group received tadalafil and I/R + Arg + Td group received tadalafil and L-arginine 30 minutes before the detorsion. Then the left testis was untwisted for four hours of reperfusion. After bilateral orchiectomy, lipid peroxidation (LPx) and glutathione (GSH) activities were examined in testicular tissue. Spermatogenesis was evaluated with Johnsen's score. Results: LPx levels of the I/R group were found to be significantly higher than for groups that received drugs for both testes (p<0.001). GSH levels of the combination group were higher than I/R group in ipsilateral testis (p<0.01) and it was significantly higher than other groups for contralateral testis (p<0.001 for I/R group, p<0.01 for I/R + Arg, p<0.05 for I/R + Td). Mean Johnsen's score of the I/R group was found to be significantly lower than treatment groups in ipsilateral testis (p<0.001 for I/R + Arg + Td group, p<0.01 for other treatment goups) and contralateral testis (p<0.001). The mean Johnsen score of the combination group was significantly higher than that of other treatment groups in ipsilateral testis (p<0.05) and it was significantly higher than in the I/R + Td group in the contralateral testis (p<0.05). Conclusions: L-arginine, tadalafil, and combination of these two molecules showed protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion injury for both testes after unilateral testis torsion.

No abstract

SPC is an effective bladder management in carefully selected NGB patients who have failed other options. Over 80% considered the SPC to have improved their urological quality of life with a mean time to questionnaire of 4 years. Severe AEs are rare, though can be particularly serious in this group of neurologically impaired patients. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:831-835, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This series outlines several complications with SIMS, similar to what has been reported with other suburethral synthetic tapes. Therefore, caution is required and patient counseling is important.

Significant urodynamic testing abnormalities are noted in the majority of TM patients undergoing urodynamics, with 95% having DO, DSD, altered compliance, or detrusor underactivity. Other than the association between LETM and DO, there were no patient characteristics predictive of urodynamics findings. Based on the severity of urodynamics findings in our series, patients with TM and LUTS should have thorough baseline urological evaluations including urodynamics and be offered ongoing surveillance. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:360-363, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis was found to be more successful in overall satisfaction and more likely for continued use when compared to the malleable penile prosthesis.

No abstract

Objective: We aimed to review the approaches of urologist and gynecologist in the management of overactive bladder (OAB). Material and methods:A questionnaire consisting of 12 items were answered by 375 urologist and 46 gynecologist. The differences between frequency of encountering OAB, their viewpoints concerning conservative treatment, and their experience related to anticholinergic drug use and the management of refractory OAB were compared. Results:The majority of the urologists, and gynecologists responded to the question "How often do you encounter OAB patients in your daily practice?" as 'in 10-25, and 50% of our patients', respectively (<0.001). The most common complaint consulted to urologists, and gynecologists were urge incontinence (51.1% vs. 64.8). The frequency of using questionnaire and voiding diary was similar in both specialties (23.9% vs. 25.1%, p= 0.892). It was observed that 38.6% of the urologists, and 50% of the gynecologists had recommended conservative treatment as a first-line treatment of overactive bladder (p= 0.049). The low sociocultural level was the most important obstacle confronting application of conservative treatment methods (54.3% vs. 37%, p= 0.012). The survey participants indicated that the most important factor which affected their decision to select an anticholinergic agent as the first-line treatment of overactive bladder was higher effectiveness of these drugs (urologists; 55.7%, and gynecologists 64%, p= 0.371). The patients who started to receive anticholinergic drugs most frequently complained both to their urologists, and/or gynecologists about dry mouth (76.3 vs. 74.5%). Based on the responses of the urologists, and gynecologists, the most frequent reason of anticholinergic drug withdrawal was patients' inability to tolerate side effects of these drugs (48% vs. 47.8%, p= 0.697). The participants indicated that in case of unsatisfactory response to one anticholinergic agent, swithching rate to another anticholinergic drug was 56.9% among urologists vs. 59.6%, among gynecologists. In addition, 36.9% of urologists and 38.5% of gynecologists recommended another pharmaceutical form of the drug with a higher dose to their patients (p=0.279). Similar number of physicians indicated that the prescribed anticholinergic drug should be continued for at least 3 months and in case of unresponsiveness patient could be considered refractory. Majority of urologists (68.8%), and gynecologists (56.5%) chose to perform urodynamic tests in patients who are unresponsive to anticholinergic treatment, (p= 0.093). Conclusion:The attitudes of urologist and gynecologist for diagnosis and treatment of OAB are mostly correlating with current guideline practices with few exceptions. Urologists tend to use bladder diaries or questionnaires less frequently whereas, gynecologists refer to urodynamic studies in patients with refractory OAB less than the urologists do. However, irrespective of the clinical speciality, conservative treatment modalities are rarely administered.