Background
Frailty assessment may inform surgical risk and prognosis that are not captured by conventional surgical risk scores.
Purpose
To evaluate the evidence for various frailty instruments to predict mortality, functional status, or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in older adults undergoing cardiac surgical procedures.
Data Sources
MEDLINE and EMBASE (without language restrictions), from their inception to May 2, 2016.
Study Selection
Cohort studies that evaluated the association of frailty with mortality or functional status at ≥6 months in patients aged ≥60 years undergoing major or minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures.
Data Extraction
Two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed study quality.
Data Synthesis
Mobility, disability, and nutrition were frequently assessed domains of frailty in both types of procedures. In patients undergoing major procedures (N=18388, 8 studies), 9 frailty instruments were evaluated. There was moderate-quality evidence to assess mobility or disability and very-low-to-low-quality evidence to use a multi-component instrument to predict mortality or MACCE. No studies examined functional status. In patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures (N=5177, 17 studies), 13 frailty instruments were evaluated. There was moderate-to-high-quality evidence to assess mobility to predict mortality or functional status. Several multi-component instruments predicted mortality, functional status, or MACCE, but the quality of evidence was low to moderate. Multi-component instruments that measure different frailty domains seemed to outperform single-component instruments.
Limitations
Heterogeneity of frailty assessment, limited generalizability of multi-component frailty instruments, few validated frailty instruments, and potential publication bias.
Conclusions
Frailty status, assessed by mobility, disability, and nutritional status, can predict mortality at 6 months or later after major cardiac surgical procedures and functional decline after minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures.
Primary Funding Source
National Institute on Aging and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; there was no registration for this review.