2018
DOI: 10.1111/codi.14405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term outcomes and quality of life following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for high transsphincteric fistulas

Abstract: LIFT has a promising long-term outcome for HTFs, with negligible impairment on continence and improved quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun X-L et al have also reported that the small size of the intersphincteric tract may also increase the risk of a technical error. 20 We could conclude that simple fistulas can be managed with fistulotomy rather than LIFT, but that might be oversimplification considering the sample size of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sun X-L et al have also reported that the small size of the intersphincteric tract may also increase the risk of a technical error. 20 We could conclude that simple fistulas can be managed with fistulotomy rather than LIFT, but that might be oversimplification considering the sample size of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…19 Sun et al reported healing rate for high transsphincteric fistula-in-ano for mature and immature fistulas were 83.7% and 77.3%, respectively, with negligible impairment on continence on long term. 20 On analyzing the factors which affect healing of the fistula tract, we found that simple fistulas, fistulas with external opening within 3 cm, and intersphincteric fistulas were significantly associated with recurrence of fistula following LIFT (►Table 2). This can be explained on the basis of failure of ligation and identification of tract, immature tract, slippage of ligature and cases done early in our learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This analysis included incontinence rates, which appeared to be better preserved with LIFT (incontinence rate 1.6%) than AF (7.8%) [20]. Results in non-CD patients have also suggested a benefit of improved continence with LIFT vs AF [5,13,[21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results seem disappointing compared to the results in the literature, where the success rates are generally higher. Table 4 shows a review of the published studies including > 35 patients [1425]. A systematic review in 2016 [26] evaluated articles with perineal procedures and found 19 appropriate articles with an overall success rate of 51–94%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%