2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment

Abstract: Background Treatment of a perianal fistula is difficult due to the risk of fecal incontinence and recurrence. The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) procedure is a sphincter-saving procedure associated with success rates ranging from 57 to 94%. The aim of our study was to find predictors for a favorable outcome of the LIFT procedure, evaluation of postoperative fecal incontinence, quality of life, and subsequent treatment with long-term follow-up. Methods This st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, 94 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; however, 28 of them were excluded, mainly because of the impossibility of isolating data on patients affected by simple AFs from mixed case reports. Therefore, a total of 66 articles [ 2 , 8 , 13 76 ] were found to be eligible (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, 94 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; however, 28 of them were excluded, mainly because of the impossibility of isolating data on patients affected by simple AFs from mixed case reports. Therefore, a total of 66 articles [ 2 , 8 , 13 76 ] were found to be eligible (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication dates of the articles range from 1994 to 2020. Among the included studies, 28 were prospective studies [ 21 – 25 , 29 , 38 40 , 42 , 44 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 56 , 58 – 62 , 64 , 65 , 68 , 70 , 71 , 74 76 ], 19 were retrospective series [ 2 , 8 , 13 15 , 18 , 26 – 28 , 33 , 43 , 45 , 57 , 63 , 66 , 67 , 69 , 72 , 73 ], and 19 were randomized clinical trials (RCT) [ 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 30 – 32 , 34 – 37 , 41 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 54 , 55 ] (Tables 1 – 2 ). The quality of the studies was generally low with a consistent risk of bias; the median score of the Jadad Scale for RCT was 3 (1–5), and only 2 studies had the highest possible score [ 52 , 55 ]; the median MINORS score for non-comparative studies was 12 (3–16), with only one study that could be regarded as excellent [ 44 ], while the median MINORS score for comparative studies was 17 (8–21) (Tables 1 , 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1). 6,10,11,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The median age of the included patients was 44 years, and the female/male ratio was 23%/77%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%