2014
DOI: 10.1159/000362178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Outcome of an Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema

Abstract: Purpose: To report the long-term outcome of an intravitreal dexamethasone drug delivery system (DEX-DDS) injection for noninfectious uveitic macular edema. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 8 eyes (7 patients). Results: The mean follow-up time was 17.3 months. Macular edema resolved in all eyes at 3.9 weeks (range 1-6.9) postinjection. The central point thickness improved from 612 ± 143 to 250 ± 55 µm (p < 0.05). The mean best corrected visual acuity improved by 0.25 logMAR (p < 0.05) at 3.9 weeks (ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, conventional treatment and biologic agents were not comparable in this study due to inadequate intragroup sampling. Our results support the common data that the duration of dexamethasone implants is 4–6 months in vascular and uveitic macular edema cases; however, extended efficacy of the implant has been reported in some patients (i.e., up to 14.5 months)[7-9]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, conventional treatment and biologic agents were not comparable in this study due to inadequate intragroup sampling. Our results support the common data that the duration of dexamethasone implants is 4–6 months in vascular and uveitic macular edema cases; however, extended efficacy of the implant has been reported in some patients (i.e., up to 14.5 months)[7-9]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Intravitreal dexamethasone implants represent an appealing option in cases where a bridging therapy is needed to save time, or in patients who are intolerant to biological agents. Long-term resolution of macular edema and improvement of visual acuity have been achieved with or without repeated injections of dexamethasone implants in inflammatory macula edema[7-9]. However, the data on the efficacy and safety in such cases are insufficient[10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This saw-toothed effect on changes in the macula with photoreceptor alteration and even long-term toxicity of high steroid concentration may pose a risk to repeated treatment success. 11,12,16,17,19 It is tempting to speculate whether longer-acting devices containing DEX would be a more suitable solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While IDI was found to be effective in the treatment of macular edema secondary to vascular and inflammatory retinal diseases, it carried the potential risks of glucocorticosteroids, which are cataract formation and glaucoma (8-16). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the functional and anatomic outcomes of IDI in a theoretically ideal group of patients with DME who were pseudophakic, nonglaucomatous, and had no family history of glaucoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%