Long‐term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: A controlled longitudinal study

Cushnaghan, J; Coggon, David; Reading, Isabel; Croft, Peter; Byng, P; Cox, Ken; Dieppe, Paul; Cooper, Cyrus

doi:10.1002/art.23101

Cited by 82 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with other studies, the results of these studies also show that at followup, patients still had worse WOMAC pain and function scores and SF-36 physical function scores (3,28) than the reference group (age-and sexmatched controls), suggesting that patients receiving THR do not return to the same levels of pain and function as those of the general population.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient‐reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort

Judge¹,

Cooper²,

Williams³

et al. 2010

Arthritis Care & Research

Self Cite

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results. On average, there was a large improvement in WOMAC scores 12 months after surgery, but whereas some patients improved, others got worse. The OMERACT-OARSI method classified 85.7% of patients as responders, MID 70.1%, and return to normal 64.1%. In general, each approach classified the same groups of patients as responding to THR. Based on total WOMAC score, patients who were younger, morbidly obese, employed, and better educated were more likely to respond to THR, but the effects were attenuated after adjustment for confounding, with only the effect of education remaining important. Conclusion. The overall average response to THR was good, but ϳ14 -36% of patients did not improve, or were worse, 12 months postsurgery. Although the OMERACT-OARSI criteria were originally designed for use in clinical drug trials, they performed well in classifying patient response 12 months post-THR. Further research is required to understand the determinants of patient outcomes following THR.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…It has been shown to be highly cost effective and very good at relieving pain and disability as well as improving quality of life (1)(2)(3)(4). It is also among the most frequently used elective surgical procedures (ϳ170,000/year in Germany [5], ϳ70,000/year in England [6], and ϳ500,000/year in the US [7]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient‐reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort

Judge¹,

Cooper²,

Williams³

et al. 2010

Arthritis Care & Research

Self Cite

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Searches identified five studies reporting analyses of specific comorbid conditions identified before surgery and long-term patient-reported outcomes. 127,130,166,184,185 Two of these studies reported separate analyses of different comorbidities in the same cohort. 184,185 Study characteristics are summarised in Appendix 7 with brief details in Table 7.…”

Section: Total Hip Replacementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In another analysis of this cohort, the MD in change in SF-36 physical function was 25.8 points (95% CI 6.8 to 44.9 points) favouring patients with no diabetes. 184 However, both analyses were based on only eight patients with diabetes.…”

Section: Diabetesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Blom

Artz

Beswick

et al. 2016

Programme Grants Appl Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH VOLUME 4 ISSUE 12 AUGUST 2016 ISSN 2050 DOI 10.3310/pgfar04120Improving patients' experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme Ashley W Blom, Neil Artz, Andrew D Beswick, Amanda Burston, Paul Dieppe, Karen T Elvers, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Jeremy Horwood, Paul Jepson, Emma Johnson, Erik Lenguerrand, Elsa Marques, Sian Noble, Mark Pyke, Catherine Sackley, Gina Sands, Adrian Sayers, Victoria Wells and Vikki Wylde Improving patients' experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme ISSN 2050-4330 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full PGfAR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Programme Grants for Applied Research journalReports are published in Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PGfAR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. Programme Grants for Applied Research programmeThe Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 2006 to produce independent research findings that will have practical application for the benefit of patients and the NHS in the relatively near future. The Programme is managed by the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility (CCF) with strategic input from the Programme Director.The programme is a national response mode funding scheme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.For more information about the PGfAR programme please visit the website: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/programme-grants-forapplied-research.htm This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by PGfAR as project number RP-PG-0407-10070. The contractual start date was in December 2008. The final report began editorial review in September 2014 and was accepted for publication in August 2015. As the funder, the PGfAR programme agreed the research questions and study designs in advance with the investigators. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PGfAR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accurac...

show abstract

“…From a group of patients with endometriosis, a significant negative correlation between VAS rating and quality of life has been evaluated by using MOS SF-36 questionnaire [57]. In addition, the same group has found a relation between hyperalgesia to pressure pain threshold measured and the impairment of SF-36 physical function as well as mental health parameters.…”

Section: Determining Quality Of Life Improvement After Surgery For Diementioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Life Improvement after Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE)

Simedrea¹

2015

Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Journal of Surgery BackgroundEndometriosis is a painful and chronic gynecologic disorder, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrium outside the endometrial cavity. Under this situation endometrial cells are implanted ectopically, that lead to retrograde menstruation via the fallopian tubes into the pelvis [1]. Endometriosis affects at least 6.3 million women and girls predominantly of reproductive age in the United States, 1 million in Canada, and millions more worldwide. It is associated with pelvic pain and infertility [2]. Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis and DIE are the three clinical presentations of endometriosis that have been described before [3]. Furthermore, several classifications of DIE have been proposed. In one classification, three different types of DIE are distinguished [4]: (I) A large lesion in the peritoneal cavity, infiltrating conically with the deeper parts becoming progressively smaller is designated as type-1; (II) In type-2, the bowel is being retracted over the lesion, and becomes deeply situated in the rectovaginal septum without infiltrating it; (III) Spherically shaped lesions, situated deep in the rectovaginal septum, and are often only visible as a small typical lesion at laparoscopy or often not visible at all. In the year 1995, Donnez and Nisolle have proposed only two types of DIE, first being caused by the invasion of a very active peritoneal lesion deep in the retroperitoneal space. In cases of lateral peritoneal invasion, utero-sacral ligaments can be involved as well as the anterior wall of the recto-sigmoid bowel junction resulting in a retraction, adhesions and secondary obliteration of the cul-desac. A second type is pseudo-DIE where the lesion originates from the rectovaginal septum tissue and consists essentially of smooth muscle with active glandular epithelium and scanty stroma [5].Today it is believed that endometriotic lesions can penetrate deep either into the retroperitoneal space or into the walls of the pelvic organs [6]. However, the mechanism is not clear and little is known about the impact of the different types of surgery in the treatment of DIE on complications, pain, patients' quality of life (QOL), recurrence rate and pregnancy rate or fertility. The aim of this review is therefore to evaluate the quality of life improvement after the different surgical modalities for management of DIE based on the above-mentioned parameters. Material and MethodIn this review we have searched The PUBMED (March 2005 to July 2015) for relevant articles. Heading terms "deep infiltrating endometriosis, quality of life" (n1=33) and "deep infiltrating endometriosis" (n2=402) were used. All pertinent articles were retrieved without any language restriction. To ensure the relevance of the publications, additional inclusion criteria were applied. We have included only those studies that contained a clear explanation of the surgical technique, an effectual evaluation of pain and an explicit description of post-operative QOL. To ensure a complete review o...

show abstract

Long‐term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: A controlled longitudinal study

Cited by 82 publications

References 21 publications

Patient‐reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort

Patient‐reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort

Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme

Quality of Life Improvement after Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About