2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09175.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term oncological outcome after post‐chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in men with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumour

Abstract: 2002 in one institution. We reviewed the clinical, surgical and histological charts of 151 such patients who had a RPLND after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The recommendations used to define conformity to RPLND standards were: the indication based on initial and residual lymph node size, shrinkage, extension of dissection and completeness of resection. RESULTSRPLND conformed to standard recommendations in 70 of the 151 (46%) patients. Conformity was complete for the surgeon who operated on 48 patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
26
2
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(58 reference statements)
8
26
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The 75-83 % accuracy achieved in some models still renders false negative rates too high to safely avoid RPLND in this setting. Our relapse rate after RPLND surgery is comparable to that of Flechon et al [25] at 18.5 % with median follow-up 6.1 months (range 1.3-39 months) post PC-RPLND. Regarding sites of relapse post RPLND, three patients did suffer relapse within the abdomen but these were outside the resection template.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 75-83 % accuracy achieved in some models still renders false negative rates too high to safely avoid RPLND in this setting. Our relapse rate after RPLND surgery is comparable to that of Flechon et al [25] at 18.5 % with median follow-up 6.1 months (range 1.3-39 months) post PC-RPLND. Regarding sites of relapse post RPLND, three patients did suffer relapse within the abdomen but these were outside the resection template.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our overall survival (92.6 % at median 100 months) compares with that in Flechon's report (87 %, median follow-up 77 months and range 1.3-187 months) [25]. Similarly the 95 % 5-year survival rate in our series is reassuring because overall 5-year survival for all patients with testis cancer is reported at 97 % at 5 years [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumours, overall survival (OS) within a clinical trial depends on the number of patients treated at the participating centre (poorer if fewer than five patients are enrolled) [3]. In the same context, the frequency of postchemotherapy residual tumour resection is associated with perioperative mortality and OS [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hintergrund dieser Empfehlungen ist eine erhöhte perioperative Mortalität von 6% nach PC-RPLA in Institutionen mit geringer Erfahrung vs. 0,8% in erfahrenen Zentren [24]. Des Weiteren liegt die prognostisch ungünstige lokale Rezidivrate aufgrund kompletter Tumorresektionen in erfahrenen Zentren mit 3% gegenüber 16% signifikant niedriger als in Institutionen mit geringer Expertise [25].…”
Section: Postchemotherapeutische Residualtumorresektionunclassified
“…Hintergrund dieser Empfehlungen ist eine erhöhte perioperative Mortalität von 6% nach PC-RPLA in Institutionen mit geringer Erfahrung vs. 0,8% in erfahrenen Zentren [24]. Des Weiteren liegt die prognostisch ungünstige lokale Rezidivrate aufgrund kompletter Tumorresektionen in erfahrenen Zentren mit 3% gegenüber 16% signifikant niedriger als in Institutionen mit geringer Expertise [25].Voraussetzung für ein onkologisch optimales Ergebnis ist die komplette Resektion der Residualtumoren unter Berück-sichtigung der etablierten Dissektionsfelder, die insbesondere auch die dorsal der großen Gefäße gelegenen Regionen erfassen. Die Ausdehnung der Dissektionsfelder wird in der Literatur durchaus kontrovers diskutiert.…”
unclassified