1987
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950030612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term nasopharyngeal intubation in obstructive sleep apnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of OA was unchanged after the removal of the MII‐pH probe. In fact, according to previous studies, the presence of a nasal probe may actually decrease the risk of OA in adults and infants (28–33) by opposing mucosal adhesion forces, decreasing the collapsibility of the pharynx, separating the tongue from the posterior pharyngeal wall, or increasing swallowing frequency resulting in a higher tone of the pharynx‐dilating muscles. To address the potential risk of nasal obstruction, we also removed the feeding tube after each feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The frequency of OA was unchanged after the removal of the MII‐pH probe. In fact, according to previous studies, the presence of a nasal probe may actually decrease the risk of OA in adults and infants (28–33) by opposing mucosal adhesion forces, decreasing the collapsibility of the pharynx, separating the tongue from the posterior pharyngeal wall, or increasing swallowing frequency resulting in a higher tone of the pharynx‐dilating muscles. To address the potential risk of nasal obstruction, we also removed the feeding tube after each feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The presence of the probe could, however, modify the polysomnographic findings. In adults, naso‐pharyngeal tubes reduce the frequency of obstructive sleep apnoeas ( Karlson et al . 1987 ; Aubert 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%