2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term low-level ambient air pollution exposure and risk of lung cancer – A pooled analysis of 7 European cohorts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
61
4
Order By: Relevance
“…68 The Effects of Low-level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE), a large pooled cohort analysis, also suggested a linear to supralinear shape of the PM 2.5 concentration-response function with no evidence of a threshold. 69 For breast cancer, we did not find a statistically significant effect of PM exposure. The studies were too limited in number to analyze subgroups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…68 The Effects of Low-level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE), a large pooled cohort analysis, also suggested a linear to supralinear shape of the PM 2.5 concentration-response function with no evidence of a threshold. 69 For breast cancer, we did not find a statistically significant effect of PM exposure. The studies were too limited in number to analyze subgroups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…68 The Effects of Low-level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE), a large pooled cohort analysis, also suggested a linear to supra-linear shape of the PM 2.5 concentration-response function with no evidence of a threshold. 69 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in distributions of air pollution exposure concentrations between two exposure assessment methods can be checked elsewhere. 25 In conclusion, our study suggests that long-term exposure to air pollution may increase the risk of liver cancer, even at concentrations below current EU standards, and adds evidence of detrimental health effects of air pollution on cancers other than lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Main analyses. To estimate HRs and 95% CIs for associations of the PM 2:5 component exposure with natural and cause-specific mortality, we applied Cox proportional hazards models following the general ELAPSE analytical framework (Hvidtfeldt et al 2021b;Liu et al 2021Liu et al , 2020Samoli et al 2021). We used strata for subcohorts contributing to the pooled cohort to account for differences in baseline hazard between the subcohorts unexplained by the available covariates.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%