2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort studies of long-term exposure to outdoor particulate matter and risks of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Robust evidence is needed for the hazardous effects of outdoor particulate matter (PM) on mortality and morbidity from all types of cancers. To summarize and meta-analyze the association between PM and cancer, published articles reporting associations between outdoor PM exposure and any type of cancer with individual outcome assessment that provided a risk estimate in cohort studies were identified via systematic searches. Of 3,256 records, 47 studies covering 13 cancer sites (30 for lung cancer, 12 for breast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our review highlights a deficiency in current environmental health research literature: studies on long-term O 3 exposure health effects are still rather rare compared to particulate matter-based studies. 78 Additionally, the meta-analysis results may be geographically biased, since large-scale O 3 exposure health risk studies up to 2022 did not cover Asian, African, or Latin American regions. However, there are some thriving cohort projects such as the Multi-Country Multi-City Collaborative Research Network covering over 22 countries or regions, 79 and the China Kadoorie Biobank enrolling over 0.5 million people, 80 enabling environmental exposure research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review highlights a deficiency in current environmental health research literature: studies on long-term O 3 exposure health effects are still rather rare compared to particulate matter-based studies. 78 Additionally, the meta-analysis results may be geographically biased, since large-scale O 3 exposure health risk studies up to 2022 did not cover Asian, African, or Latin American regions. However, there are some thriving cohort projects such as the Multi-Country Multi-City Collaborative Research Network covering over 22 countries or regions, 79 and the China Kadoorie Biobank enrolling over 0.5 million people, 80 enabling environmental exposure research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , 2 , 3 Exposure to PM 2.5 has been associated with adverse health effects, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, lung cancer, and premature mortality. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Several studies also suggest that long-term PM 2.5 exposure is a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. 9 , 10 , 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Exposure to PM 2.5 has been associated with adverse health effects, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, lung cancer, and premature mortality. [4][5][6][7][8] Several studies also suggest that long-term PM 2.5 exposure is a risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. [9][10][11] Dementia is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases and a major public health concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review highlights a deficiency existing in current environmental health research literatures, that studies on long-term O 3 exposure health effects are still rather rare compared to particulate matter-based studies. 78 Also, the meta-analysis results might be geographically-biased, since large-scale O 3 exposure health risk studies till 2022 did not cover Asia, Africa or Latin America regions. However, there are some thriving cohorts such as the Multi-Country Multi-City (MCC) Collaborative Research Network covering over 22 countries or regions, 79 and the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) enrolling over 0.5 million people, 80 working on environmental exposure projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%