We have compared the efficacy of local UVB photother apy with topical (bath) photochemotherapy in 13 patients with bilateral chronic hand dermatitis. In each patient, one hand was treated with UVB phototherapy and the other hand with topical (bath) photochemotherapy. Both treatments moderately improved the chronic hand der matitis after 6 weeks' treatment. We observed no signifi cant differences in improvement between the modalities, but side-effects occurred more often on the photochemotherapy-treated side. Considering the similar responses and relative incidence of side-effects, we would advise starting treatment with UVB phototherapy and only using topical photochemotherapy if this fails.Several studies have shown the therapeutic effectiveness of oral psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) in treating hand dermatitis, defined as a chronic inflammatory eruption of the hands with vesicles or hyperkeratotic lesions without evidence of psoriasis.The efficacy of UVB phototherapy has also been demonstrated in 10 patients with allergic contact dermatitis of the hands; treatment times, however, were lengthy (the mean being 5 months) and maintenance therapy was necessary. In a further study, oral PUVA was compared with UVB phototherapy in 35 patients with chronic eczematous dermatitis of the hands of varying aetiology, both treat ments being effective, although the results with PUVA were better. Finally, topical PUVA for chronic hand and foot dermatoses has also been shown to be effective, while topical (bath) PUVA in psoriasis was as useful as oral PUVA;8,9 in addition, an advantage of the topical over oral PUVA was the lack of systemic, particularly gastrointestinal, side-effects.Phototherapy increases the incidence of phototoxic reactions and non-melanoma skin cancer, but the risk Correspondence: Pieter G.M. van