2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Impact of Arsenic in Drinking Water on Bladder Cancer Health Care and Mortality Rates 20 Years After End of Exposure

Abstract: Exposure to arsenic is related to a significant need for bladder cancer health care and to high mortality rates even 20 years after having controlled arsenic levels in drinking water. Affected individuals should be aware of the significant impact of this ecological factor. Further research is required to identify strategies for the management of bladder cancer in arsenic exposed populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the three levels of As exposure examined (< 300; 300 – 590; > 600 μg/L As), age-adjusted cancer mortality rates per 100,000 were as follows: 15.7, 37.8, 89.1 per 100, 000 males and 16.7, 35.1, 91.5 per 100,000 females. While these findings profiled the highly exposed populations of Taiwan, increased mortality from bladder cancer due to As exposure in drinking water was also observed in Argentina [35,36,62,63] and Chile [38,39,55]. For example, compared to un-contaminated areas, males and females from the highly contaminated Region II of Chile, experienced mortality rates due to bladder cancer, 6.0 and 8.2 times greater, respectively [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In accordance with the three levels of As exposure examined (< 300; 300 – 590; > 600 μg/L As), age-adjusted cancer mortality rates per 100,000 were as follows: 15.7, 37.8, 89.1 per 100, 000 males and 16.7, 35.1, 91.5 per 100,000 females. While these findings profiled the highly exposed populations of Taiwan, increased mortality from bladder cancer due to As exposure in drinking water was also observed in Argentina [35,36,62,63] and Chile [38,39,55]. For example, compared to un-contaminated areas, males and females from the highly contaminated Region II of Chile, experienced mortality rates due to bladder cancer, 6.0 and 8.2 times greater, respectively [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Arsenic in drinking water is a risk factor for BC in many parts of the world (Naranmandura et al, 2011). The chances of exposure to arsenic depends on the living conditions, such as whether they receive their drinking water from public and sanitary systems; this possibility is low in accordance with the standards defined by arsenic (Fernández et al, 2012). The findings from a casecontrol study in Main-New Hampshire-Vermont showed that there is a link between low to moderate levels of arsenic in drinking water and the risk of BC; the daily BC rate in these individuals is 20% higher than the United States population ( [Internet], 2017).…”
Section: -Nutritional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings of a study in Bangladesh showed that mortality risks doubled after consumption of arsenic-contaminated water (Burger et al, 2013). In a recent Chilean analysis, it was found that after 20 years of discontinuation of arseniccontaminated water use, mortality rates were significantly higher in contaminated areas (Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.6; 95% CI: 3-4.7) (Fernández et al, 2012). The mechanism of BC induction through arsenic is uncertain, but it seems that arsenic increases the risk of BC through indirect inhibition of sulfhydrylcontaining enzymes, interference with cytotoxic metabolism, genotoxicity, and inhibition of enzymes that play an antioxidant role (Tapio and Grosche, 2006).…”
Section: -Nutritional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Furthermore, studies from Taiwan and Chile indicate that elevated cancer risk among arsenic exposed populations persists for several decades after cessation of exposure. 3,11,51 Therefore, the association between arsenical skin lesion status and lung cancer mortality may be attributable to skin lesion status either as a proxy for increased susceptibility to arsenic toxicity or as a proxy for past cumulative or peak arsenic exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%