2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:1(13)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Hydrologic Impact of Urbanization: A Tale of Two Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
59
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as surface water quality is controlled by both natural factors (hydrological and meteorological conditions) and human influences (urban, industrial and agricultural activities), decision makers are facing with significant difficulties the problem of how to manage surface water quality [3][4][5]. Although water quality monitoring has greatly improved over the last few decades, a representative and reliable estimation of surface water quality is still challenging [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as surface water quality is controlled by both natural factors (hydrological and meteorological conditions) and human influences (urban, industrial and agricultural activities), decision makers are facing with significant difficulties the problem of how to manage surface water quality [3][4][5]. Although water quality monitoring has greatly improved over the last few decades, a representative and reliable estimation of surface water quality is still challenging [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression models have the advantage of simplicity, often relating event loads to catchment characteristics through empirical equations [Vaze and Chiew, 2003], but cannot be confidently applied outside the region where they were created or outside their range of calibration. Process-based models are more complex, data intensive, expensive, and require considerable expertise on the part of the user [Bhaduri et al, 2001], but allow the user to model the process in a spatial temporal field. For example, the semidistributed storm water management model [Metcalf and Eddy Inc., 1971;Huber and Dickinson, 1988] is a commonly used urban storm water management tool that has extensive data requirements (1-hour rainfall, Manning's roughness coefficients for all surfaces, depression storage for all surfaces, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and requires extensive parameterization and calibration [Balascio et al, 1998], but generally provides reasonable catchment outlet results. A common problem with current urban water quality models, such as the long-term hydrological impact assessment model [Bhaduri et al, 2001;Lim et al, 2006], is that they use soil conservation curve number approach to predict runoff, which links runoff response to soils and land use in ways that fail to capture the dynamics of VSA hydrology. In VSA watersheds this approach may not adequately capture the spatial extent of contributing areas, as they are, in many cases, independent of soil hydrologic group and more controlled by topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asimismo, los cambios en los usos del suelo alteran significativamente las características hidrológicas de la superficie de los terrenos modificando los patrones y tasas del flujo del agua, con la consiguiente alteración de los sistemas costeros acuáticos que dependen de la dinámica que sigan tanto los aportes hídricos continentales como los materiales terrígenos asociados. Si este tipo de modificaciones en el balance hídrico sucede sobre áreas amplias o críticas de una cuenca o región puede tener impactos inmediatos y a largo plazo, incluyendo el aumento en los volúmenes de escurrimiento y la reducción de los suministros de agua a los mantos freá-ticos (Bhaduri et al, 2000(Bhaduri et al, , 2001Harbor, 1994;Ma, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified