2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
171
5
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
171
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3). These results are in line with Albaugh et al (2004) who reported 119% and 23% increases in stem mass as result of fertilization and irrigation respectively. During this early stage of plant development, increases in water and nutrient availability are positive for establishment and growth, but resource allocation is directed towards establishment especially via the production of fine roots (Coyle and Coleman, 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Resource Availability On Growthsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3). These results are in line with Albaugh et al (2004) who reported 119% and 23% increases in stem mass as result of fertilization and irrigation respectively. During this early stage of plant development, increases in water and nutrient availability are positive for establishment and growth, but resource allocation is directed towards establishment especially via the production of fine roots (Coyle and Coleman, 2005).…”
Section: Effect Of Resource Availability On Growthsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4) indicates improved efficiency with increased fertilization and irrigation. Previous studies of the growth efficiency of fertilizer loblolly pine and slash pine found sustained increases (Albaugh et al, 2004) or increases that disappeared as the stand grew older (Jokela and Martin, 2000;Will et al, 2002). Improvements in biomass growth efficiency observed in this study can be attributed to improvements in photosynthetic abilities and a decrease in stomatal limitation due to the effect of water stress (Trichet et al, 2008).…”
Section: Effect On Resource Availability On Foliar Nutrient Content Asupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1a). This was not consistent with many results reported for temperate forests (Murthy et al 1996;Maier et al 2002;Albaugh et al 2004;Choi et al 2005). The possible reasons are as follows.…”
Section: Microbial Biomass C and Water Soluble Organic C In Surface Scontrasting
confidence: 80%