2020
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term follow up of serum pepsinogens in patients with gastric cancer or dysplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication

Abstract: Author contribution: Gitark Noh analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript; Nayoung Kim designed the study, collected the samples, and supervised the preparation of the manuscript; Yonghoon Choi performed the statistical analysis and drew the figures; Hye Seung Lee graded the histological atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia; Young

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that increased PG II levels are more specific for detecting active H. pylori infection than PG I levels [ 18 ], and PG I levels increase frequently due to drugs, including aspirin [ 19 ]. Differences in serum PG values between the eradicated and non-infected subjects were not detected at ≥24 months after successful eradication [ 20 ]. High serum PG I and PG II levels indicate hyperchlorhydric stomachs [ 21 ], whereas low serum PG I levels and PG I/II ratios indicate hypochlorhydric stomachs with extensive atrophy [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that increased PG II levels are more specific for detecting active H. pylori infection than PG I levels [ 18 ], and PG I levels increase frequently due to drugs, including aspirin [ 19 ]. Differences in serum PG values between the eradicated and non-infected subjects were not detected at ≥24 months after successful eradication [ 20 ]. High serum PG I and PG II levels indicate hyperchlorhydric stomachs [ 21 ], whereas low serum PG I levels and PG I/II ratios indicate hypochlorhydric stomachs with extensive atrophy [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, early diagnosis or surgery is signi cantly important to the treatment of tumor. In those studies, many scholar explored the novel biomarkers for early diagnosis or evaluation the prognosis and recurrence in gastric cancer [17][18][19]. TFAP-2β constituted promoter activity in gastric cancer and contributed to the development of the metabolic syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When atrophic change occurs, PG I level produced in chief cells decreases, as does the PG I/II ratio. In general, severe AG is determined when the PG I/II ratio is less than 3.0 [ 14 16 ]. Histologically, mucosal atrophy was classified according to the updated Sydney System [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%