2016
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term follow-up in newborn screening: the role of collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Le centre hospitalier universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 7 Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8 Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Le centre hospitalier universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 7 Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8 Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these advances in care, patients with IMD have fewer severe sequelae, in turn reducing disease morbidity and increasing life expectancy [5]. In recognition of increased life expectancy among IMD patients, a current priority in IMD research is long-term follow-up of patients to generate high quality, longitudinal clinical data to evaluate outcomes and inform both clinical care and public policy [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the extreme rarity of these disorders, many conditions added to the NBS have limited data on long-term outcomes and efficacy of treatment and would be nearly impossible for individual states to determine. Collaboration between states and nations to track both short-term and long-term outcomes is critical for better understanding these disorders [ 33 , 34 ]. Successful long-term follow-up initiatives require coordinated efforts from multiple groups—including federal agencies, state health departments, academic institutions, primary care providers, and family support organizations [ 33 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaboration between states and nations to track both short-term and long-term outcomes is critical for better understanding these disorders [ 33 , 34 ]. Successful long-term follow-up initiatives require coordinated efforts from multiple groups—including federal agencies, state health departments, academic institutions, primary care providers, and family support organizations [ 33 , 35 ]. As NBS expands to include additional disorders, a redoubled effort for organized long-term follow-up should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the heterogeneity in phenotype and genotype-phenotype correlations of many NBS-related conditions (current and proposed) results in prognostic uncertainty which can impact the timespan of the diagnostic odyssey continuum. Long-term follow-up of NBS is key [ 22 , 23 ], yet notably lacking, and could improve understanding of a rare condition’s natural history [ 24 ]. This is particularly salient as NBS expansion with genomics accelerates and amplifies the need for shared decision-making [ 25 , 26 ] in care management given the level of uncertainty that will accompany the greater magnitude of conditions and carrier statuses identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%