2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01358-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the quality of clinical data collection for a pan-Canadian cohort of children affected by inherited metabolic diseases: lessons learned from the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network

Abstract: Background The Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network (CIMDRN) is a pan-Canadian practice-based research network of 14 Hereditary Metabolic Disease Treatment Centres and over 50 investigators. CIMDRN aims to develop evidence to improve health outcomes for children with inherited metabolic diseases (IMD). We describe the development of our clinical data collection platform, discuss our data quality management plan, and present the findings to date from our data quality assessment, highlighting k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high prevalence of Fabry disease 9 in Canada has resulted in a high volume of data being available from 1 country, but we realize that this is not possible for most rare diseases. Other groups have proposed independent registries to facilitate international collaborative study of rare and ultrarare diseases, 8,[27][28][29][30][31] and our data demonstrate the advantages of independent registries relative to IFRs (higher data completeness and lower cost). A model of infrastructure that could support such collaboration has been proposed for Gaucher disease.…”
Section: Early Engagement Of Patient Advocacy Groups Resulted In a Hi...supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high prevalence of Fabry disease 9 in Canada has resulted in a high volume of data being available from 1 country, but we realize that this is not possible for most rare diseases. Other groups have proposed independent registries to facilitate international collaborative study of rare and ultrarare diseases, 8,[27][28][29][30][31] and our data demonstrate the advantages of independent registries relative to IFRs (higher data completeness and lower cost). A model of infrastructure that could support such collaboration has been proposed for Gaucher disease.…”
Section: Early Engagement Of Patient Advocacy Groups Resulted In a Hi...supporting
confidence: 57%
“…28,29 Databases have been designed to facilitate secure collaborative data collection at low cost 30 and have already been used successfully in inherited metabolic diseases. 31…”
Section: Early Engagement Of Patient Advocacy Groups Resulted In a Hi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMDs typically follow one of three broad clinical course trajectories, with different implications for healthcare usage and experiences: (a) chronic and generally non-progressive; (b) acute episodes of severe illness with or without accompanying chronic multisystem sequelae and (c) progressive multisystem disease. Children with any of 30 priority IMDs included in an existing Canadian paediatric cohort study that will serve as one potential recruitment source54 55 are eligible for this study (table 1). Few of the IMDs included in that cohort study, however, are characterised as following trajectory (c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66,67 The CIMDRN recently has published lessons for consideration in future research initiatives for rare diseases based on their experience with the establishment of a comprehensive database for IEM. 68 Contact registries facilitate rapid implementation of studies by expediting recruitment and enrollment. 69,70 For example, the NIH-funded RDCRN has established a contact registry in which patients with the conditions studied by each of the participating consortia (several of which include IEM) can enroll.…”
Section: Registry-based Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several other recommendations have been developed to guide the establishment of rare disease patient registries including suggestions around registry governance, core data sets, information systems, data quality monitoring, and confidentiality 65,66 . The CIMDRN recently has published lessons for consideration in future research initiatives for rare diseases based on their experience with the establishment of a comprehensive database for IEM 67 …”
Section: Registry‐based Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%